Associate
cheers, just found it after i posted that question.. oops!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
fornowagain said:Just started with a new 170 CCBWE 0546XPMW. Gets to 2700 @ 1.45v without errors. Cycled s&m for a couple of hours, idles at 27C maxed at 41.7C. I keep thinking to get another cooler, but this Hyper 6 seems to do ok. Now to see how stable it is in some 3d benchies.
ted34 said:Just had the 170 arrive (exact same stepping as yours). Will post back with how it goes. Have to wait till monday when project handed in - cant afford to stop working to run benchmarks
Clint said:
ted34 said:10degrees - i thought the heating in my flat was ****.
Am having probs with the temps. Have found that once it exceeds 45degrees under load it fails. These cpu's are so temperature sensitive. So far seems stable (still testing though) at 2.8ghz at 1.36v. Could do with watercooling for dual cores
Agent WD40 said:Ouch Clint! Thats one impressive clock you have there my friend. It most certainly seems like the VPMWs are better than the UPMWs for sure!
Once again, nice clock.
Agent
Hope your wrapped up warmClint said:Ambient 10C
ted34 said:10degrees - i thought the heating in my flat was
Am having probs with the temps. Have found that once it exceeds 45degrees under load it fails. These cpu's are so temperature sensitive. So far seems stable (still testing though) at 2.8ghz at 1.36v. Could do with watercooling for dual cores.
How much difference at idle and load did you find removing the ihs made? Also what cooler are you using? Been abit unsure as to whether to remove ihs with a xp120 heatsink because its not height adjustable so might not get good contact if i do.
Haha, the mobo is very close to the window...not that cold in room.Big.Wayne said:Nice work but quite a sacrifice having to sit in a freezing cold room to use your computer?
Clint said:Yup, 44-45C seems to be the number to avoid passing, craps out for me as well.
That maybe so, but I rebuilt my watercooling yesterday after a recommendation from XS.easyrider said:Not been an issue here.These chips are designed to run hotter
He was running 2.8ghz .easyrider said:I would imagine that if running stock and a hot room and cpu reached 50c and failed prime it would be going back.
something more than just temps IMO
smids said:He was running 2.8ghz .
Oh I get you . As you can see I didn't get up long ago! But then again, my example does show temps made a difference in my case...easyrider said:Which leads me to believe the failure was not temp related.