-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** Official Ryzen Owners Thread ***
- Thread starter Frozennova
- Start date
*Ahem*
The gskill rgb were THE ones to go for a little while back. The Corsair led are trash though tbh. 2666 was all i could muster and that was shaky
I picked these up for £120 yesterday with next day delivery. Not bad to get instant 3200Mhz when you have to pay lots more for G.Skill Flare for instant work.
If i knew I'd be guaranteed that speed I'd have gone with the Corsair myself. Over at overclock.net there are users showing that the revision of the memory plays a part etc, Corsair was a minefield. I paid £211 for my gskill 3600
steep as hell but I'm an impatient child. Did you get confirmation from anywhere or was it a gamble?
If i knew I'd be guaranteed that speed I'd have gone with the Corsair myself. Over at overclock.net there are users showing that the revision of the memory plays a part etc, Corsair was a minefield. I paid £211 for my gskill 3600
Did you get confirmation from anywhere or was it a gamble?
MSI have a list of supported RAM and at what speeds online, it was on the list. These are V5.39 sticks, which according to other forums is not meant to work but I took MSI's word for it and they are right, works a treat with a hitch.
Just to add, these are SK Hynix too. LOL. Perfect at 3200Mhz on A-XMP profile.
How did you know what revision they were before buying? 100 questions sorry mate!
I didn't. MSI has the model number listed no revision numbers, turns out revisions wasn't a problem.
I think the Samy B-Die thing is something everyone has jumped on before better bios updates have been released. It seems all single rank RAM is managing regardless of the manufacturer.
Over on overclock.net people with different revisions are having issues. I have single ranked Corsair led 3000 on my shelf. They won't go above 2666 on tomahawk nor the crosshair. It's still a mess at the moment. Happy for you with 3200 though! Any differences to report? Without a frame counter i couldnt tell between 2400 and 3200 but benchmarks loved it.
Just look at the vendors site. This is the Tomahawk supported sticks and at what speeds. They all work. If they are not listed then you are taking a gamble. Type in your G.Skill RAM and see if it is there.
https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/support/B350-TOMAHAWK.html#support-mem
Glad to hear this re new bios seems things are getting better
About to test 1.3 for the toma on one build see if it improves the gskill 3200 sams 14c will report back
How the **** did you manage that!? Same clock speed same ram speed and timings and I got 1782
I have the same mobo, still nowhere near those results even with bias on. OS tweaks I imagine.....
Its a setting in the motherboard, however, I am not sure if it is a true result, @AMDMatt could help you with that.
Its the CB15 performance bias option. Still I'm nowhere near that score lol. Hopefully gupster will share his secret sauce.
No secret sauce, willing do video recording of setup / run like I did for my i5 4690K 5.2GHz validation on air.
I have Win 7 Pro x64, no OS tweaks just what I use daily. I did ISO as per section Windows 7 on Ryzen as in OP of this thread. Then Windows Power Plan as in section Power Plan editing in Windows.
Here is result with no CB PB on C6H UEFI 0081 instead of 0079 used earlier.
Here is result with CB PB
I change no priority of CB, etc. Again willing to do boot of PC showing UEFI options > full install of app > bench run captured using a camera.
Let's say when a driver improves performance is that cheating? simply put it's a UEFI option, which if Asus wanted not be there and apply anyhow, without anyone knowing. Would we not say ahh UEFI xxxx version performs so much better than xxxx version.
Anyhow no biggie it's just a bench run, nothing more
.
I have Win 7 Pro x64, no OS tweaks just what I use daily. I did ISO as per section Windows 7 on Ryzen as in OP of this thread. Then Windows Power Plan as in section Power Plan editing in Windows.
Here is result with no CB PB on C6H UEFI 0081 instead of 0079 used earlier.
Here is result with CB PB
I change no priority of CB, etc. Again willing to do boot of PC showing UEFI options > full install of app > bench run captured using a camera.
Let's say when a driver improves performance is that cheating? simply put it's a UEFI option, which if Asus wanted not be there and apply anyhow, without anyone knowing. Would we not say ahh UEFI xxxx version performs so much better than xxxx version.
Anyhow no biggie it's just a bench run, nothing more
.Let's say when a driver improves performance is that cheating? simply put it's a UEFI option, which could if Asus wanted not be there and apply, without anyone knowing. Would we not say ahh UEFI xxxx version performs so much better than xxxx version.
Anyhow no biggie it's just a bench run, nothing more
I was only joking
