• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Official Ryzen Threadripper Owners Thread ***

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 66701
  • Start date Start date
1.225V is stock voltage. (according to the gigabyte board at least) That was just a quick test to see if it would even boot at 4GHz. I've been running stock with the memory running at 3200 using xmp and still getting the odd bluescreen and moderately high dpc.
 
I'm sure I have seen mine higher when running prime at stock, perhaps just different motherboard BIOS (running MSI) .

I had to give my 1900x 1.3v for 4.1, needs 1.4 for 4.2, temps get a bit high but don't have all the fans on the rads enabled yet, just a test fit make sure everything is working before I add GPUs, hard pipes etc, ram is doing 3600, again needed a touch of voltage above stock, not sure how stable to be honest only done an hour or so of prime as spent most of my time trying to get bubbles out of the bloody Phantek CPU cooler, which seems to have a frustrating air trap in the top corner.....grrr, looks nice though :D

20170916_235223.jpg


don't know about DPC stuff, all seems good to me.
 
Last edited:
sandys said:
Isn't 1.25v stock voltage? I'm sure mine is around that?
Click to expand...

Mine is 1.125v (it'll actually benched at 0.95v @ 3.4ghz sipping 130watts - super efficient), but of course it varies massively due to XFR, power saving etc. I've seen a min of 1.02v up to 1.48v when vcore is set to auto.
 
CPU at stock with memory running at xmp failed hci memtest at a whopping 58.3%.

Only thing that seems a little odd is that cpu-z reports that the timings are 3200 14-14-14-31-78 yet shows the XMP profile as 3200 14-14-14-31-97. I wonder if that's the cause.
 
I've just tried upping CPU SOC to 1.2V and CPU SB SOC to 1V and dropped tRC back to 97 and it's still failed HCI at 60%. Think I'll drop the ram back to SPD JEDEC timings and see if it can at least pass that.
 
Dear 1950X owners,

There's a new 3d rendering benchmark here: http://www.kraytracing.com/kray3benchmark2017/

It is based on the upcoming Kray 3 rendering engine for Lightwave3D.
I’m working with these softwares, and I’d like to know, how 1950X performs in this application before I upgrade.

I have an i7-5960X @ 4.3GHz, and a Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7GHz config.
Under Cinebench, they score exactly the same, around 1600 points.
But in this test, Ryzen seems about 10-15% slower than the i7!

Would someone be so kind to run the benchmark on an 1950X config?
It’s only 1-2 minute to run and upload the score to the online database (please add the @ ...GHz to your description), but it would be a great help for me.

Thank you very much!
 
7331 at stock with 3466C16 mem
8645 at 4.1ghz

It does seem very inconsistent between runs.
 
I also just bumped the multiplier 38x with a little bit of offset voltage and a little llc and got 7963 and 1.15.3 running the same system.

Yup it does seem a little inconsistent.
 
Added my 1900X at Stock and 4Ghz but only with Dual channel RAM as my Gskill arrived broken, RMA time :( Depite the clock speed bump I expected it to be slower than Ryzen 7 due to split cores.

Tried with CL16 3600 but CL14 3200 produced higher numbers in this case, as mentioned its results seem to be inconsistent but with windows hard to say its not doing some thing else I suppose.
 
Last edited:
sandys said:
I'm sure I have seen mine higher when running prime at stock, perhaps just different motherboard BIOS (running MSI) .

I had to give my 1900x 1.3v for 4.1, needs 1.4 for 4.2, temps get a bit high but don't have all the fans on the rads enabled yet, just a test fit make sure everything is working before I add GPUs, hard pipes etc, ram is doing 3600, again needed a touch of voltage above stock, not sure how stable to be honest only done an hour or so of prime as spent most of my time trying to get bubbles out of the bloody Phantek CPU cooler, which seems to have a frustrating air trap in the top corner.....grrr, looks nice though :D

20170916_235223.jpg


don't know about DPC stuff, all seems good to me.
Click to expand...

Hell of a CPU block.
 
Yup it looks good but it's so full of bubble even now, this could be that my pump is too strong, I have no gpus in the loop, figured I would play with one thing at a time.

Anyway, these Agesa things, software tells me my 1900x is on 1.0.0 3 rather than the newly touted 1.0.0.6 I take it this could be the source of my inability to get 3600 RAM stable, how do I go about getting an update?
 
I think the AGESA for threadripper is different to the one for ordinary ryzen. Pretty sure mine is 1.0.0.3A and yes, It can be found in aida.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom