Looks like The Toon army won't be splashing the cash this summer
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=784531&sec=england&cc=5739
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=784531&sec=england&cc=5739
veloso?!
theres no way u could amass that team for 76 mill unfortunately madonnas cousin would cost most of that as it is, let alone trying to plunder modric from spurs too.
Looks like The Toon army won't be splashing the cash this summer
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=784531&sec=england&cc=5739
Neither will Man.U., judging by the reluctance to spend the Ronaldo money last season.
Hardly 'splashing the cash' though is it?
To be honest I really posted because Loki used to stupid name to refer to Newcastle. I thought this wasn't allowed? I thought I'd do the same for Man Utd in the interests of fairness.
Hardly 'splashing the cash' though is it?
To be honest I really posted because Loki used to stupid name to refer to Newcastle. I thought this wasn't allowed? I thought I'd do the same for Man Utd in the interests of fairness.
He more or less confirmed the Chamakh signing, saying:
"He could be the first one, yes. We have to finalise some papers and some of the medical. It's not done yet, but it is very close."And of other signings he said:
"Leave that to me and come back in July and you will see. When you come back for the Emirates Cup you will see."
None of the alternative names are offensive tbh, just childish and annoying
Neither will Man.U., judging by the reluctance to spend the Ronaldo money last season.
Hardly 'splashing the cash' though is it?
To be honest I really posted because Loki used to stupid name to refer to Newcastle. I thought this wasn't allowed? I thought I'd do the same for Man Utd in the interests of fairness.