** Official ** Summer 2010 Transfer Thread - Signings, Sightings and Rumor's in Here

Status
Not open for further replies.
If he leaves us it'll be for a team in the Champions League. He wants to compete at the highest level and City can't offer him that. They're just a real life version of a Football Manager team with money cheats.
 
if winning matters then surely he'd prefer to be at City over Liverpool? Not trolling but that does seem pretty obvious to me.

Maybe if he were coming from another club and he had the choice of either City or Liverpool but its different if you are at the club. I cant see him being attracted to City either to be honest.

I think the only team that he would end up at is Chelski in the EPL.

Barca have spent too much already to justify getting him this season. Inter could be a choice as it would be a new start.

Madrid are the only other team that could afford him.

Or he could come to Arsenal ;)
 
What did is say when Utd signed Valencia last summer? There are plently of better wingers than him around. What does it say about Utd signing Smalling and the Pygmy? There are loads better CB's and strikers than them. :confused:

Valencia was the best winger in the league last season :confused:

As for Smalling he's been brought in based on his potential, not to walk into the first team like Figueroa would if you signed him!

But hey I'll give him some credit he's better than Scharner and Beattie who you were also interested in

EDIT: Didn't notice you mentioned Hernandez, same for him as Smalling they're being brought in on their potential besides which Hernandez was bloody impressive at the World Cup!
 
Valencia was the best winger in the league last season :confused:

As for Smalling he's been brought in based on his potential, not to walk into the first team like Figueroa would if you signed him!

But hey I'll give him some credit he's better than Scharner and Beattie who you were also interested in

EDIT: Didn't notice you mentioned Hernandez, same for him as Smalling they're being brought in on their potential besides which Hernandez was bloody impressive at the World Cup!

I think he is trying to say you arent fighting with the big clubs for the "big" players anymore. Instead of going for say Torres, you are going for Hernandez.
 
I think he is trying to say you arent fighting with the big clubs for the "big" players anymore. Instead of going for say Torres, you are going for Hernandez.

While this is true I respect Man Utd for it. At least now they're being more financially responsible, even more so than smaller clubs such as West Ham and Portysmouth.

I'm not a big fan of Platini and his 'ideas' but I do agree with his sentiment when he suggests that football clubs should have to live within their means. If Bob United earns £10m this year and spends £2m in total and forecasts an expenditure of a further £4m without recompense then Bob United should not be able to spend more than the £4m remaining.

Clubs in this country however go into debt and claim "everyone is for sale" and then go out and bid £12m for Loic Remy.

Wolves (my club, one of the few clubs not in debt and living within their means in the premiership) were outbid 5 times by Portsmouth last season before their financial fiasco!
 
Valencia was the best winger in the league last season :confused:!

:D

He done well but he wasn't close to being the best winger in the league. In fact, I'd have taken Nani ahead of him let alone the likes of Malouda, Lennon etc.
As for Smalling he's been brought in based on his potential, not to walk into the first team like Figueroa would if you signed him!

But hey I'll give him some credit he's better than Scharner and Beattie who you were also interested in

EDIT: Didn't notice you mentioned Hernandez, same for him as Smalling they're being brought in on their potential besides which Hernandez was bloody impressive at the World Cup!

So it says Utd have to gamble on potential because they can no longer compete for proven world class players? Of course not.

Your last post was nothing short of nonsense. Liverpool possibly signing Figueroa is extremely easy to understand; Figueroa's a solid player and proven in England. Who else could have we signed? I can't think of many top LB's that are available and the couple which are being touted about would to cost massive money, money which Liverpool and most other clubs (Real, City and Chelsea apart) can't or won't pay.

Going by your post, any club that doesn't buy the best player in the world in their position, it says something about their ambitions?

It was only last week that you said Liverpool signing Cole was a great move, what does that say?
 
The four Arsenal goalkeepers have been training hard in Austria and Fabianski and Szczesny have kept clean sheets in their two pre-season games, but rumours of Akinfeev to Arsenal. He also mentions Man Utd but with the influence of Arshavin I think he'd choose Arsenal. If this were to materialize, I think it would happen next (2011/12) season. For me, this is Almunia's "make or break" season. And if Fabianski doesn't learn anything this season then I'd get rid of him too and promote the two junior keepers.
 
The four Arsenal goalkeepers have been training hard in Austria and Fabianski and Szczesny have kept clean sheets in their two pre-season games, but rumours of Akinfeev to Arsenal. He also mentions Man Utd but with the influence of Arshavin I think he'd choose Arsenal. If this were to materialize, I think it would happen next (2011/12) season. For me, this is Almunia's "make or break" season. And if Fabianski doesn't learn anything this season then I'd get rid of him too and promote the two junior keepers.

Akinfeev is quality from what relatively little I've seen of him, would be a great shout for either United or Arsenal.

As for Pavlyuchenko... well he's just a poor man's Berba for me, absolute pony.
 
:D

He done well but he wasn't close to being the best winger in the league. In fact, I'd have taken Nani ahead of him let alone the likes of Malouda, Lennon etc.

So Valencia who was consistent throughout the entire season wasn't better than Lennon who was pretty much injured for the entire second half of the season, Malouda who only started performing during the second half of the season or Nani who again only really started performing at the very end of the season? In fact Nani's match winning games only came once Valencia was injured so we're talking the final 3/4 games

Your last post was nothing short of nonsense. Liverpool possibly signing Figueroa is extremely easy to understand; Figueroa's a solid player and proven in England.

What you're describing there is all the attributes of a squad player not someone who is going to play every week, all my original point meant was once upon a time (meaning even 12 months ago) Liverpool wouldn't be going for those types of players to be their first choice, likewise even in our current situation you wouldn't see Man Utd going for those types of players

Who else could have we signed? I can't think of many top LB's that are available and the couple which are being touted about would to cost massive money, money which Liverpool and most other clubs (Real, City and Chelsea apart) can't or won't pay.

Well Coentrão seems to be the obvious choice, not sure he would cost that much

Going by your post, any club that doesn't buy the best player in the world in their position, it says something about their ambitions?

Nope my post doesn't say that at all, all it does say is for a club signing a competent LB (nothing more nothing less) rather than someone with actual quality says something about their ambition. You're not telling me that you as a Liverpool aren't disheartened by Figueroa style signings? I know I would be as a United fan

Christ I'd even wager for his experience if nothing else Silvestre on a free would be a better bet.... or Heinze, you wanted him before and he's probably available

It was only last week that you said Liverpool signing Cole was a great move, what does that say?

Does.Not.Compute :confused:

J.Cole has/is quality whoever signed him was getting a great player

Joe Cole coming in from Chelsea
Figueroa coming in from Wigan

Surely you can see the difference there?

Nothing against Wigan they've had/have some good players, Valencia as an example but Figueroa isn't one of them
 
It won't be great, he's been fantastic, but the owners are clearly investing, and honestly, you don't need someone playing as well as Parker has to improve league position dramatically. He's not all that young either so it might be a better idea to cash in now, get a couple of more than good enough players to get West ham back up in the top half and pay off a little bit of the debt.

I think its a good couple years before West Ham is back with an outside chance at the last Europa spot places again, they've got a very good basis for a squad, with some really promising youngsters. Parker will be half wasted till then, as you said, the problem is there seems to be interest from all over. I think if it came down to someone making an offer, FAR more than two clubs will be interested.

Be a shame if he goes as he is pretty much the dynamo in midfield who drives the team. I do think they'll replace him with someone decent though, Grant knows what he's doing and can find decent players. The only potential problem is the board deciding to cash in and thinking Kovac is adequate to in his role. Kovac is bloody awful, the one thing I did not get with Zola was Kovac, awful while he was on loan, and then made it permanent, awful awful player.

Personally I think West Ham will be relegation fodder again next season.

Pretty much the same poor team as last season and then I read on the papers you want to sell Cole and replace him with some random Frenchie?

lolwut!?!

It seems to be the same poor transfer policy as the last few years, i.e. by random foreigners and hope they adapt quick enough and play well enough. Which I doubt they will.

Always had a soft spot for west ham fans (your as deluded as us Newcastle fans in thinking you are a big club like our fans do :p) so dont wish them any ill but I think if you stay up it will be because other teams being worse than you rather than West Ham being too good.
 

Sorry but I think you don't know what you're talking about.

Valencia wasn't the best winger in the league last year, I'd guess even most Mancs would accept that. Coentrão is predominantly a winger, not a fullback and Benfica told Bayern they wanted over £25m for him.

There is no obvious top LB around that could be had for sensible money which leaves us with the choice of a solid player like Figueroa or taking a gamble on a youngster. Figueroa's a far better player than you're giving him credit for but that's you opinion, the idea that if you're not signing a top player, it says something about your ambitions is rubbish though.

Utd don't have a top RB or CM yet it doesn't seem like you're going to sign one, does that say something about Utd?

I'm not having a pop at Utd btw, I'm just trying to show you that it's not unusual for sides to have solid/steady players in certain positions and not superstars throughout the side.

edit: and the Cole part was because a week ago you were praising Hodgson's (even though he didn't make the choice) transfer strategy, yet now there's a problem with it. So which is it?
 
Last edited:
I think Figueroa will be a decent player for Liverpool.

I think they've also got a really good player in Cole :)

They signed some one else didn't they? Begins with a J!

Not too bad if they can keep hold of the back bone of the squad.

Obviously need some cash spending on it, but you could throw that at most teams.
 
The J would be Jovanovic.

Have to say that I am less happy about Jovanovic than I am about Cole or potentially Figueroa, Jovanovic was free though so I suppose that lessens the doubt somewhat. Whereas I think Cole can be quality and Figueroa could do a job for us, I am less inclined to believe that Jovanovic can do a job for us, but we'll see.
 
He looked a handy player during the WC (Serbia's best player) and in the few Liege games I've seen. With the state of our squad, his versatility could be invaluable.
 
I think Valencia was definitely one of the top wingers last season :confused: There were a couple others up there (Lennon not being one of them) but Valencia to have a season that good as his first at a new club with significantly higher expectations while trying to replace the World Player of the Year? Pretty damn impressive if you ask me.
 
I think Valencia was definitely one of the top wingers last season :confused: There were a couple others up there (Lennon not being one of them) but Valencia to have a season that good as his first at a new club with significantly higher expectations while trying to replace the World Player of the Year? Pretty damn impressive if you ask me.

Agreed, Valencia had a very good season. He's a very solid winger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom