so what's Torres' beef then?
"Unfortunately, I cannot do much more," Hodgson said. "His beef is with the club and not me.
"Fernando's situation has nothing to do with me, he made that perfectly clear over the phone during the World Cup and when I met him face-to-face.
"He knows what I would like to do with the club. He knows how much I value him.
"But his issues are with what has gone on in the past rather than the future.
"If he has problems with the club for things in the past, it is difficult for me to dismiss that."
soccernet and eurosport i read it on.
Where would Torres go if he decided he'd had enough?
Where would Torres go if he decided he'd had enough?
No. Would never go to Real and other than money, which doesn't seem to matter to Torres as much as winning does, City have absolutely no pulling power yet.City? Real?
sorry, do you think they're making up the quotes? if they're not then to be fair it's quite a specific point that's coming across in the quote. I mean Hodgson is a representative of the club and he is the one reported to have said it so I'd wonder at how he could have been taken out of context in this instance.
No. Would never go to Real and other than money, which doesn't seem to matter to Torres as much as winning does, City have absolutely no pulling power yet.
Nothing less than £40-£45million if he was to leave. Hodgson would have his work cut out to find a replacement.
If he stayed in England he would go to Chelsea, if he went back to Spain it would be with Barcelona and the only other team that could afford him would be Inter.Who else could afford him? Chelsea?
No. Would never go to Real and other than money, which doesn't seem to matter to Torres as much as winning does, City have absolutely no pulling power yet.