*** Official Ubiquiti Discussion Thread ***

So, only place I can see meshing is in settings-system-advanced-wireless meshing, which was already off. Anywhere else?

Or is it this:-



No Unifi switches, mostly TP-Link I think, standard non-managed switches, and few with POE for cameras and 2 of the U6-LR's. All hard-wired too.

If they’re not meshing then the graphics are lying because there is no connection between them. Either buy UniFi switches or ignore the topology graphics.
 
I will have a looked, it's the wired ethernet speed that concerns me more than the WiFi though if both could be improved that would be great

There is no IPS/IDS/Snort on the UX.

And you literally have the one wired client plugged directly into the LAN port? It shouldn’t make any difference whether it goes to a switch or not so that should be fine. Have you tried a different cable?

What do you get if you plug the wired client PC into the SH4 in modem mode?
 
What I want to do is use a /29 and map the external public IPs to 4 devices inside the network with the router being the fifth IP address. Pretty much any decent router can do that, but I could never make a UnifiOS device do it on PPPoE. If it can now, great.
I haven't tried that and I'm not sure how it could be done in the current UI, I don't think DMZ is possible but I could be wrong.
 
No Unifi switches, mostly TP-Link I think, standard non-managed switches, and few with POE for cameras and 2 of the U6-LR's. All hard-wired too.

That'll do it. The topology can be a bit of a mess at the best of times (though it's been more stable of late), but throw non UniFi switches into the mix and it can get really messed up.

But do what @WJA96 suggested and disable meshing, or wireless uplink or whatever they call it today. It's not needed if all your AP's are hard wired and with non UniFi switches can cause mayhem.

Someone else reported the same thing, have a read of this.
 
I’ll give it a go. From memory you were able to select the Multi-WAN option and it would allow you to allocate the public IP addresses to reservations inside the local network but it only worked on the fixed IP option (very popular in the US) and it didn’t work on PPPoE or DHCP on the WAN interface.

If it works it’s one less reason to hold a disappointment grudge against Chris Buechler. If you were around the UBNT community in 2016 he posted that he expected to have it working within 6 months. It actually took closer to 6 years (assuming it does actually work now).
Still doesn't work AFAIK.
 
I haven't tried that and I'm not sure how it could be done in the current UI, I don't think DMZ is possible but I could be wrong.

You don’t need DMZ. If you select Fixed IP as your WAN interface option you then have a Multi-WAN option that allows the incoming IP address to be routed to a device inside the firewall as if it was outside the firewall. You can keep on adding public and external IP addresses as much as you like. But I do not believe it was ever implemented on PPPoE or DHCP interfaces for UnifiOS devices.
 
If they’re not meshing then the graphics are lying because there is no connection between them. Either buy UniFi switches or ignore the topology graphics.

You "can" get non unifi switches to show up in the topology. I've got a managed TP-Link doing just that (the only non-unifi switch in the network) and the topology diagram correctly shows that I have an AP plugged into it, it doesn't know which port number, but for the diagram that's fine. You need it to support LLDP though.
 
You "can" get non unifi switches to show up in the topology. I've got a managed TP-Link doing just that (the only non-unifi switch in the network) and the topology diagram correctly shows that I have an AP plugged into it, it doesn't know which port number, but for the diagram that's fine. You need it to support LLDP though.

That’s very useful to know. I’ve always assumed it could only map out UniFi components but if it’s doing it on LLDP it would seem sensible that it could map most managed switches.

I am completely smitten with the new Pro Max switches though. They do it all. 2.5GbE on some ports? Yes. Poe++ on some ports? Yes. 10GbE SFP+ uplinks? Yes. It would be nice if they were 100% 2.5GbE PoE++ but in reality you would be really unlikely to need more than is in the switches as they stand. Hopefully the Enterprise Max switches will be along soon to make me even happier with 10GbE PoE goodness. And the whole lighting up like a Christmas tree is pretty awesome as well.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, they look good and one is on my wish list once I manage to get some conduit in the wall from my 'network' cupboard downstairs up to the loft.
 
Yeah, they look good and one is on my wish list once I manage to get some conduit in the wall from my 'network' cupboard downstairs up to the loft.

Absolutely and each PoE++ port will run a USW-Flex which is 4 surveillance cameras on a 100m/100m run so you can go a massive distance from the switch and it’s all rock solid for power and data.
 
Absolutely and each PoE++ port will run a USW-Flex which is 4 surveillance cameras on a 100m/100m run so you can go a massive distance from the switch and it’s all rock solid for power and data.
All I need UniFi to do now is release a proper Leaf switch with multiple 25 Gbps ports and the ability to do L3 routing and BGP. Not sure all of those will happen, but it's nice to wish!
 
All I need UniFi to do now is release a proper Leaf switch with multiple 25 Gbps ports and the ability to do L3 routing and BGP. Not sure all of those will happen, but it's nice to wish!

You mean the USW-Leaf? I had one. I think I even tried to sell it on Members Market!


No-one wanted it at the time, so they canned it.
 
Yes that one, but to have it managed by the UniFi Network Application and support proper L3/Leaf switch features. Otherwise I might as well chuck a second hand Dell Leaf in there.
 
Yes that one, but to have it managed by the UniFi Network Application and support proper L3/Leaf switch features. Otherwise I might as well chuck a second hand Dell Leaf in there.

Point taken. But seriously, they were giving them away at one point. Literally e-mailing folks and offering to send one out to you for feedback. No-one wanted them. So there was zero development and personally, I blame Chris Buechler. (Not really).
 
Point taken. But seriously, they were giving them away at one point. Literally e-mailing folks and offering to send one out to you for feedback. No-one wanted them. So there was zero development and personally, I blame Chris Buechler. (Not really).
It makes you wonder what the Aggregation Pro use case is. You could put 4 downstream devices on it making use of 25 Gb to talk to one another, but there's no other UniFi switch/gateway that I'm aware of that will do 25 GbE, so I really don't see how it fits in besides loads of 10 Gb capable clients. You can only really use the 25 Gb ports for clients which makes little sense as they're designed to be uplinks.
 
I have no evidence to back this assertion up but I swear Robert Pera comes into the office some mornings and literally says - “I was at the Grizzlies last night and I saw an HPE aggregation switch in the cabinet. I only want to see silver in my cabinets - SORT IT OUT!” and they just make it. I literally can’t see any other reason why we have car chargers etc.
 
Ubiqiuiti are never going to do a proper L3 product, if they were capable of it then it would have happened. Instead you get stuff marketed as being for a datacentre that can't do MCLAG or EVPN.
 
There is no IPS/IDS/Snort on the UX.

And you literally have the one wired client plugged directly into the LAN port? It shouldn’t make any difference whether it goes to a switch or not so that should be fine. Have you tried a different cable?

What do you get if you plug the wired client PC into the SH4 in modem mode?
Went to do some tests on basis of what you suggested and getting 900+ now so prob was something VM end

Still only 300-350 WiFi but that's plenty for what I need it for
 
Has anyone tried out a U7 Pro yet?

I have a couple of wifi5 UAP-AC-Pro's and one of thoose standalone and UAP-Flex HD's in my house that I might want to replace.

Probably along with a an upgraded POE switch for the faster POE+ ports on the U7's.

Do they share the same mounting bracket as the UAP-AC-Pro?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom