Thanks.If you use DHCP on auto then it’ll use the UDM, and the UDM in turn uses whatever is set on internet.
I’ve never used DNS shield as I use my encrypted DNS so can’t comment there. Take a look at the release notes.
Is the built in DNS server with the ad blocker and DNS shield a good replacement for Ad Guard or Pi Hole?
Is the built in DNS server with the ad blocker and DNS shield a good replacement for Ad Guard or Pi Hole?
Agreed. It’s fine for the vast majority of people where you can set and forget, but if you are used to using a proper ad blocking DNS server it is lacking. I use a lot of rewrites as an example and that afaik is not straightforward using UniFi DNS.No
Adguard / Pi-Hole allow for much more fine-grain control.
Did you just select Auto, or choose some manual settings.I'd say Yes. I have just removed my Pi-Hole from home and remote location. One less device to maintain and happy with the performance of the built in, enable and forget.
Did you just select Auto, or choose some manual settings.
This.No
Adguard / Pi-Hole allow for much more fine-grain control.
I'm sure there was something similar to this on Reddit the other day but with a UDMSE. It tended to do it when the NIC was fully saturated though.Something a bit odd going on with one of my PCs. I've had it connected to the Gateway Ultra both cabled directly and via Wifi to the default network associated with my SSID. After a couple a few minutes it loses internet access, everything else on that network carries on fine, with no issues. There is nothing in any of the logs for the client, nothing in security logs etc. If I switch the Gbe port to one of the other networks that I've got setup no issues at all, the only different is its running only a couple of devices. DHCP addresses are fine, DNS is set to the Gateway. I've updated all the drivers on the PC for both the NIC and Wifi card
Any suggestions on what maybe killing access?
I found when I had the express the UI was at times incredibly slow, it improved with software updates but pages were not responsive. As an AP it worked great and had good coverage and was easily to hide away due to the form factor, but as a gateway as well, it was a little under powered, much worse than the UDR.
Surely it would be fine once configured, they wouldn't be needing to access it themselves would they.Maybe food for thought and not deploy to the family member. Mmm
are you buying new access points? If so then no.
There is no such thing as future proof. WiFi 6 is the established standard but it’s on the cusp of being replaced by WiFi 7.
If you have existing access points then you may want to hold off upgrading as a broad selection of WiFi 7 APs will be available within a year.
If you are buying used then I’d expect a load of cheap WiFi 6 access points to start filtering into the market as people replace older units with WiFi 7.