Yes, you have to use the controller built into the UCG-Ultra. The 2.5Gbit WAN port on the UCG-Ultra is pointless since it connects to the 4 port switch internally on a 1Gbit connection. From what I've read the VPN performance is poor on the UXG-Lite due to its dual core 1Ghz CPU compared to the quad core 1.5Ghz CPU of the UCG-Ultra and UXG-Max. You haven't missed anything obvious.I'm debating the replacement of a still working but aging SonicWall TZ for my hone network.
I currently have 2 x AC-LR and 1 x U6-Lite APs with the controller running on a small Ubuntu VM. I do sometimes use the SSL-VPN functionality of the SonicWall to tunnel all traffic when on holiday (for instance watching the BBC Olympic coverage from France this summer).
If I stick with the Unifi stack, it seems my choices are:
1) UXG-Lite - approx £130. Only single WAN but I'm unlikely to get a second connection. Currently on 80/20 FTTC which is the best available in our village until FTTP arrives at some point. Even what that lands I can't see a need for the top-tier packages, so 1Gbps WAN performance limit is unlikely to be an issue. I keep the controller VM running. Single LAN also not a problem as I have a switch next to my current SonicWall and thus only use two ports on that.
2) UXG-Max - approx £200. More performance / physical port capacity than the UXG-Lite.
3) UCG-Ultra - approx £120. Dual WAN option, 4 x LAN. Built-in Unifi controller. 2.5G WAN port seems pointless given the LAN ports are all 1G but, as above, not going to be an issue for me.
At first glance the UXG-Lite seems redundant now with the UCG-Ultra which has more features and physical capacity at the same price. Do you have to use the controller built-in to the UCG? Though it seems to daft to have a VM to occasionally poke for an upgrade when the UCG can do it all. As I don't need the performance & 2.5G ports on the UXG-Max, it seems the UCG-Ultra is the best option.
Have I missed anything obvious?
Speedtests are irrelevant as they're likely UDP. The issue is TCP traffic inside a TCP tunnel. You can get TCP Meltdown.
Use UDP.
Not unless they release actual speakers, only looks to be amps at the moment.I wonder if this is a genuine Sonos rival.
Not unless they release actual speakers, only looks to be amps at the moment.
But as above, I want a proper 25/100 GbE switch option.
Yes, you have to use the controller built into the UCG-Ultra. The 2.5Gbit WAN port on the UCG-Ultra is pointless since it connects to the 4 port switch internally on a 1Gbit connection. From what I've read the VPN performance is poor on the UXG-Lite due to its dual core 1Ghz CPU compared to the quad core 1.5Ghz CPU of the UCG-Ultra and UXG-Max. You haven't missed anything obvious.
The app is infuriating, I have to delete it and reinstall it every few weeks, and sometimes I can't control anything, but otherwise very happy.Very true. Forgot stupidly re Sonos’ other products lol
We’ve got a few at home and not had any issues.
Arc
Beam
Sub
4 x SL
Port - not used recently.
Thank you. The UCG-Ultra looks to be the best option for me then.
The app is infuriating, I have to delete it and reinstall it every few weeks, and sometimes I can't control anything, but otherwise very happy.
Interesting, although do wish they would just focus more on the network products.
Would be nice to have a larger selection of 10/25/100GB switch options.
I installed a UCG-Ultra at a family member and it’s been spot on, unlike the Express that I got a credit note for.
They aren’t using VPNs though. I make use of VPNs to home a lot, so sticking with pfsense for now.
IPSEC S2S to my parents
Wireguard for my iOS devices
OpenVPN for my laptop, but may shift to IPsec.
Cheers. Only VPN use for me would be an occasional single remote client coming in and then hairpining back out to the Internet.
You know how Ubiquiti started, right?It's like the Apple of networking Gear
No, but now you've suggested it, the answer is pretty obviousYou know how Ubiquiti started, right?