Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2008
- Posts
- 6,767
- Location
- Orsett, Essex
Love the neatness of it and such a cool name
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10663/10663937adc48f5fb6be35b91a4022457c1ad946" alt="Cool :cool: :cool:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
4 x 12core cpu's no HyperThreading so one thread per core, so thats 12 x 4 = 48 cores = 48 threads.
Same as BaBa has but without the overclocking, max speed is 2.3Ghz
Think expensive would stop me?![]()
No that wouldn't be possible, the OS thing without some virtual layer.
Win7 is limited to 2 processors so that wouldn't work, for Windows you would need Server, preferably 2008 R2 to get half decent performance, but for folding Linux is the business.![]()
A friend in Canada does this all the time. He uses a standard Windows 7 PC to set up a x264 video compression for a particular video then he sends the commands to his Solaris server right next to it. Can compress 1280x720 at 2 minutes per minute! (48FPS, media is 24FPS)Nah Westmere x5650's or L5640's are the sweet spot for folding on Xeons, 5500's are the old Gainstown 4 core.
So your looking at more like £2K+ with memory
Not sure where you are going with the multiple OS thing, but let us know how you get on with it![]()
I know it sounds retarded but x264 has a Unix variant with the same command lines so you send the video and commands to the workhorse and it does the work, sending the results back.Sooo.. two machines, one windows and one unix.. ok.. gotcha..![]()