And we don't know what the military's policy towards this stuff is.
We have seen the video and the other military crew from the navy ships involved who confirm the story. That alone means it should be taken seriously and properly investigated.
No one has explained the video to go along with Fravor testimony. Also its not just Fravor. If it was just him only sure you could write it off as a mistake. But that is far less likely when the event involves, what was it 6 navy ships, 6 fighter jets with 12 crew (Pilot + Weapon Officer). Then we have the other pilots, weapon officers and crew who worked directly in the navy ships sensor rooms confirming the event. Further backed up by at least one of the pilots seems to be hit by active ECM as seen in the video and his testimony.
If they are even visiting that would mean the number of sightings are real. Yet only a tiny, tiny fraction of those sighting are believed to have crashed. That would be about right for technology. If we assume the whistle-blowers are telling the truth about 12 crashes out of an estimated 1+ million visits spread over 100+ years its hardly unreasonable that a tiny fraction crashed. No technology is perfect or flawless. Pilots make mistakes, micro fracture develop and stress's build up over time and go unnoticed till its critical, unexpected problems arise. A small number of failure rates in any technology is to be expected. With enough craft of any type over enough time something at some point well go wrong.
I am basing that on my understanding of technolgly and space. Yes I do think that beings that have mastered interstellar travel would still have failures and things go wrong. I think even if we get to that level in the distance future and we sent are large amount of unmanned probes out over a large timeframe. Then we would expect some to fail. Perhaps we would get to the stage where failure rates would be measured in 1 per year(s) or 1 per decade but they would still happen.
There is a lot of guess work in the numbers. But if we go for 10 to 12 crash's as reported and assuming they have been visiting for over 100 years that's a significant better ratio to flights crashing then our own craft. That's less crash's in 100 years then we have in 1 year.To make your point better you need to compare our planes crashing to advanced Alien technology crashing.
That puts ET in an even higher % of rubbish flying, they have a really bad ratio of flights to crashing
That's not remotely accurate. Brazil is a good example but as they don't speak English you don't hear about it much in English communities. Even China behind the great firewall has UFO's. Its world wide not the US only. Even the French have there own encounters or the so called crash in Italy.
Care to share links to news articles etc?
Who says they are travelling across the universe? Grusch again proposed during the hearing that these may be interdimensional. Maybe we should imagine a submarine traversing between different mediums rather than spaceships.
He didn't say "I think I saw something" he said he saw something. And it was 100% a UFO.
