Have you got any sources that point to Grusch and Elizondo being raided? A quick Google isn't bring up anything.
Who or what says he's the "real deal" exactly?
There still seems to be a lot of contradiction around Elizondo, just look at the two Reid's on whether he worked or didn't or even had an worthy responsibilities at AATIP if he did.
And you still seem to be deflecting on the fact whistle-blowers don't usually roam free - Snowden isn't living in Russia because he enjoys the icy climate, vodka and borscht.
The fact the current troupe do, gives the impression they've been cleared by someone to talk about it to the public, 'it' currently boiling down to the square-root of nothing, in which case they aren't whistle-blowers but rather doing PR and being someone's mouthpiece.
Either way, this thread is over four years old and we're still in the same position even after folk were bleating that UFO confirmation would be imminent of the infamous UFO report. And let's be honest, in another four years we will still be in the same position.
I am not deflecting. There are two types of whistleblowers. There are the illegal ones like Snowden who are taking classified information and giving it out to the public which are the ones that get locked up. Then there are the legal ones that are making formal whistleblowers complaints with legal representation and following correct procedure.
Those legal ones like Grusch are not handing out classified information to the public but they are providing hard evidence as part of the correct whistleblowers procedures. The reason as you put it, they often say
“their favourite phrase of "oh, i got to be careful what i say" “ is because they lose there pensions and end up in jail.
Take Grusch in the pubic hearing he often said I cannot say that publicly but I am happy to provide that information and evidence in a secure environment. Which he did.
““Either way, this thread is over four years old and we're still in the same position even after folk were bleating that UFO confirmation would be imminent of the infamous UFO report. And let's be honest, in another four years we will still be in the same position.””
Its not remotely the same position. Hard evidence has been handed over to the SKIF investigation, ICIG investigation and AARO and all 3 say there is evidence to support what the Whistle-blowers are saying. Since then its been reported around 40 Whistle-blowers have provided evidence enough to convince members of Congress action needs to be taken.
“Have you got any sources that point to Grusch and Elizondo being raided? A quick Google isn't bring up anything.”
Grusch said in his official legal complaint there are reprisals being targeted against him and others. Back in 2023 it was reported his house was raided and around the same time a journalist lets slip that he leaked Grusch personal medical files which got handed to him by the DOD which backs up Grusch claim about targeted reprisals from the DOD. I am sure you can find all that if you did back though this thread. My lunch break is over, I don't have time to dig though this thread looking for old links.
• The SKIF investigation said the Whistle-blowers claims are real and have merit.
• The ICIG investigation said the the Whistle-blowers claims are real and have merit.
• AARO has said there is evidence to support some of what the Whistle-blowers are saying is true.
If this is all BS how do you explain above from the people with access to the hard evidence the whistleblowers handed over? Not got time to dig out the old links and videos. Some quotes I do have on hand.
“Tim Burchett: "I think everybody left there thinking and knowing that Grusch is legit"
Robert Garcia appears to be shaken by whatever was discussed and said there was substantial info shared with the committee.
Moskowitz said this verified a lot the claims made about UAP’s.
Moskowitz also said "Based on what we heard many of Grusch claims have merit!""