Pentagon releases UFO footage


It’s believed that the UFO programs are classified under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. Information under this classification sits outside of the standard secrecy levels operated within the rest of the department of defence.

Two months after Cliff Sims left ODNI in Jan 2021, his former boss, DNI John Ratcliffe said:

"But frankly, there are a lot more sightings than have been made public... things that we are observing that are difficult to explain... There are instances where we don't have good explanations for some of the things that we've seen... when that information becomes declassified, I'll be able to talk a little bit more about that."
 
Last edited:
Oh my God please just stop. STOP.

The same person warned that simply printing the name ‘Immaculate Constellation’ could trigger government surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of whoever publishes it.
Click to expand...

NO MORE. This is madness. It is utter depravity which I'd normally be on board with but you have to draw a line somewhere, please.
 
The other side of the coin is. What’s a valid explanation for the government having a classified UAP program that turned out to be real and a large amount of people, some of them high-ranking officials from that program all saying its real along with astronauts, multiple presidents and 100+ other government officials from the USA and other government. Like the Defence Minster of Canada or the Belgium Air force all saying its real.

Its fine to be sceptical but many of these people are from inside the classified UAP taskforce so should be taken seriously. If any of this is real, these are the people who would have access to the information. Given the people involved a serious investigation needs to take place to prove it real or fake. Its fine not to believe but at this point we shouldn't be automatically writing it all off as a joke.
 
There's that word real again, five times. :p I don't think anyone is questioning that Governments have real secrets. As always, it's the content of what is secret that is could be interesting. Doesn't matter that high ranking people say 'oh yeah, there are programs that are top secret', there's nothing we can get from that.

I'm also sure there's lots of boring stuff that ends up being top secret regardless of any codenames they might be given. Thanks for the video though, will have a peek later; but I'm guessing they're discussing all the fantastical infinite energy tech that must be hidden within the Immaculate Constellation.
 
Pottsey said:
Its fine to be sceptical but many of these people are from inside the classified UAP taskforce so should be taken seriously.
Click to expand...
True whistleblowers leaking classified information, like Snowden or Manning, typically end up imprisoned or going on the run. Yet, these UAP/UFO "whistleblowers" are somehow given the all clear by whatever agency/military unit they, supposedly, worked for and free to go on talk shows and publish books.
It's understandable why folk are sceptical, especially when a lot of it is nothing burgers.

The guy from Why Files said it perfectly in his recent episode -
 
I thought the military would be filled with classified programs, otherwise you would make everything public and your enemy would know everything about all your tech?

eg here's a video that is telling us about IAP with jamming capability that is deployed from an aircraft.

 
Last edited:
The next Congressional hearing is scheduled for next month, as well as the second Stanford Sol symposium.


Very much looking forward to these speakers.

Kirk McConnell, staff member (retired), Senate Armed Services Committee

Eric Shrock, former Deputy Director, Technology Development and Integration, Lockheed Martin

Dr. Eric Davis, theoretical and applied physicist, Earthtech, formerly the Aerospace Corporation
 
SexyGreyFox said:
Every time Pottsey posts something it's like the Black Knight White Knight scene in Monty Python.
Click to expand...
Got to kick some life back into the thread once every so often :)

EDIT:
visibleman said:
True whistleblowers leaking classified information, like Snowden or Manning, typically end up imprisoned or going on the run. Yet, these UAP/UFO "whistleblowers" are somehow given the all clear by whatever agency/military unit they, supposedly, worked for and free to go on talk shows and publish books.
It's understandable why folk are sceptical, especially when a lot of it is nothing burgers.

The guy from Why Files said it perfectly in his recent episode -
Click to expand...
Not sure its fair to say that when some of the current whistle-blowers had there homes raided, personally information leaked out, harassing phone calls along with threats, retaliation and reprisals at work and outside of work. Its on record they suffered from clear “administrative terrorism” against them from senior leadership after they made the whistle-blower complaint. The evidence points to David Grusch being the real deal but I am not as convinced about Greer who I think is a fake who is just trying to latch on for the marketing and money.
 
Last edited:
keyser van someone said:
I thought the military would be filled with classified programs, otherwise you would make everything public and your enemy would know everything about all your tech?

eg here's a video that is telling us about IAP with jamming capability that is deployed from an aircraft.

Click to expand...
The problem is illegal classified programs and lack of legal oversight. According to the whistle-blowers there are illegal classified programs being run via illegal money without the correct Congress oversight they should have. The people who should be approving and checking these special access classified programs are being excluded. The projects are being run off the books to the point where no one from Congress has any oversight which is not allowed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom