Pentagon releases UFO footage

No, as the NASA page states and as other interviews with scientists have said, the variants under sample are not the same as found on Earth, so yes they are alien in that no examples of that mutated variant on the ISS exists on Earth.
 
Last edited:
Why does a video being uploaded and then deleted become a sign of some form of sinister event and apparent backing up on the original claim?

www.metabunk.org

Orb UAP photographed by pilot on tarmac and flying during the day in Manchester

Judging by the photos and the video and change in position this object was not enough to cease taxiway operations unnamed.jpg is probably taken 1st and the aircraft from which the photo is taken is located on the apron and not yet on the taxiway. We see a Ryan Air jet turned towards the runway...
www.metabunk.org www.metabunk.org

Metabunk peeps shows the evidence suggests a balloon is in the recent airport video/photos. Feel free to disagree with this reasoning on their site.
 
keyser van someone said:
Why does a video being uploaded and then deleted become a sign of some form of sinister event and apparent backing up on the original claim?

www.metabunk.org

Orb UAP photographed by pilot on tarmac and flying during the day in Manchester

Judging by the photos and the video and change in position this object was not enough to cease taxiway operations unnamed.jpg is probably taken 1st and the aircraft from which the photo is taken is located on the apron and not yet on the taxiway. We see a Ryan Air jet turned towards the runway...
www.metabunk.org www.metabunk.org

Metabunk peeps shows the evidence suggests a balloon is in the recent airport video/photos. Feel free to disagree with this reasoning on their site.
Click to expand...

I think the thing I also found interesting, is that the account used to upload it was 1 day old, and the account was following usual suspects of the "UFO community" before it disappeared. (make of that what you will)

I saw the balloon hypothesis, but for me the image is so poor and it's so easy to fake stuff these days, it could just as easily be fake as it could be a totally benign object such as a balloon or some other junk.
 
NutritioN said:
Or, you could've just said this. It's shorter.
Click to expand...
But that's the point. it's no longer a part of a species found on Earth. The exact same way once humans start to colonise Mars, babies born on Mars will not be the same as humans on Earth as the DNA will be forced to evolve to adapt to the new conditions and with that would come all kinds of physical changes.

Essentially the Panspermia principle simplified. We humans may well be the early seedlings transported from another planet in the solar system that survived hitching a ride on a piece of rock until it crashed onto Earth, yet because of the conditions we live on, our code isn't going to be the same code as the original source material due to evolution, which is exactly what NASA are observing with those organisms on ISS.
 
Last edited:
I do enjoy this thread and the endless new supposed revelations. Why on earth would an intelligence, clearly a highly developed technologically advanced intelligence (supposedly) which has travelled vast distances be dropping drones or other assorted craft in to the planets atmosphere nay at near ground level and supposedly below which could not be gleaned from off-planet observations?
 
Last edited:
keyser van someone said:
Why does a video being uploaded and then deleted become a sign of some form of sinister event and apparent backing up on the original claim?

www.metabunk.org

Orb UAP photographed by pilot on tarmac and flying during the day in Manchester

Judging by the photos and the video and change in position this object was not enough to cease taxiway operations unnamed.jpg is probably taken 1st and the aircraft from which the photo is taken is located on the apron and not yet on the taxiway. We see a Ryan Air jet turned towards the runway...
www.metabunk.org www.metabunk.org

Metabunk peeps shows the evidence suggests a balloon is in the recent airport video/photos. Feel free to disagree with this reasoning on their site.
Click to expand...
Metabunk post a lot of nonsense and often jump to balloons and birds when its clearly not. How about balloons are banned in that area with measures to make sure there are no balloons. If there are any balloons the airport runway is shutdown till its removed and a shutdown never happened. Plus your telling me a highly trained pilot that spends countless hours in the sky doesn’t know what a balloon is? Plus the object is reported as descending vertically against the wind which balloons cannot do. Drones can do that but a balloon not a chance.

I am all for debunking but the debunk has to match the facts and a balloon doesn't work. Its like when people say the Go Fast Video is debunked because it was only going 50MPH something ish and not that fast. That's not a debunk that's only showing the speed the object is moving at.

As for your first question its reported that the governments are running UAP/UFO disinformation campaigns. This is not just reported but its been proven with a few well documented ones. Some people are being fed fake leaks and fake UFO info. Others have been threatened and suffered retaliation when they try to talk about UAP's. So when accounts get shut done, rightly or wrongly people assuming its due to one of those agency threatening them and making them shut it down. While I don't agree with that in this case, that's the reason many people see it as a sign of sinister event and apparent backing up on the original claim.
 
Last edited:
Pottsey said:
Metabunk post a lot of nonsense and often jump to balloons and birds when its clearly not. How about balloons are banned in that area with measures to make sure there are no balloons. If there are any balloons the airport runway is shutdown till its removed and a shutdown never happened. Plus your telling me a highly trained pilot that spends countless hours in the sky doesn’t know what a balloon is? Plus the object is reported as descending vertically against the wind which balloons cannot do. Drones can do that but a balloon not a chance.

I am all for debunking but the debunk has to match the facts and a balloon doesn't work. Its like when people say the Go Fast Video is debunked because it was only going 50MPH something ish and not that fast. That's not a debunk that's only showing the speed the object is moving at.

As for your first question its reported that the governments are running UAP/UFO disinformation campaigns. This is not just reported but its been proven with a few well documented ones. Some people are being fed fake leaks and fake UFO info. Others have been threatened and suffered retaliation when they try to talk about UAP's. So when accounts get shut done, rightly or wrongly people assuming its due to one of those agency threatening them and making them shut it down. While I don't agree with that in this case, that's the reason many people see it as a sign of sinister event and apparent backing up on the original claim.
Click to expand...
I enjoy Metabunk, each to his own I guess :) I think the video was taken down in this case because the pilots aren't supposed to use their phone while flying/driving/captaining an aircraft, also not social media savvy and don't usually post videos(?). I'm not sure what claims were made about the object was performing but the video appears to show a normal balloon doing normal balloon things. I think it's just the pilot being careful.

How many planes have been taken out by a mylar balloon? Myler balloons have about 5% the mass of a pigeon and an engine can deal one of more of those no problem. https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0074ryc/qi-series-c-12-combustion

Without links to further evidence I can't comment on the social media circus but when wasn't UAP/UFO news 99%* fake? *1% margin of error.
 
keyser van someone said:
but when wasn't UAP/UFO news 99%* fake? *1% margin of error.
Click to expand...
Since around 2017 when it turned out the classified government UAP departments are real and the leaked video really did come from the UAP departments. It was around then we found out much of the UAP news is not fake. Don't get me wrong some of it is people making fakes but its not 99% fake or even remotely close to that high. The AARO reports prove its not all fakes. Don't fakes make up something really low like under 1% of all reports they get?

No idea what that link is, your going have to explain it. I cannot view iPlayer.
 
Last edited:
New Jersey getting some UAP twitter action, or rather reporting feedback loop. People report something including to the FBI, FBI have to investigate, now the news can use the phrase "the FBI are investigating", people then look out for anything in the night sky, people report all kinda of crazy stuff - are they sure that's what they saw? :) eye witness testimony is pretty terrible.

All the videos I've seen so far just look like aircraft at night with standard lighting/flashing.


 
Last edited:
keyser van someone said:
"the FBI are investigating"
Click to expand...

Image.jpg


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom