Pentagon releases UFO footage

Lysander said:
Chad Underwood and Sean Cahill are a couple of others. There's an interview with Underwood about it here:

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/201...o-q-and-a-with-navy-pilot-chad-underwood.html
Click to expand...

But it's just more words - there's no actual evidence, these people can say whatever they like. Being retired navy pilots gives them a bigger platform and the media will lap it up, people will simply believe them for that reason alone.

It's also not that outlandish to point out, that these people have all been retired for a while now, it wouldn't take a tremendous stretch to imagine them banding together and cooking up a good story they can sell, would it?

Also, what is he talking about regarding birds?

There are many species of migrating birds such as geese etc, routinely fly as high as 10k-20k feet when migrating.

https://www.livescience.com/55455-how-high-can-birds-fly.html
 
Screeeech said:
But it's just more words - there's no actual evidence, these people can say whatever they like. Being retired navy pilots gives them a bigger platform and the media will lap it up, people will simply believe them for that reason alone.
Click to expand...

I am in agreement that there is no evidence that has been made public. I was purely giving you an example of another testimonial, since you were under the impression that only two individuals had spoken up about it.

Screeeech said:
Also, what is he talking about regarding birds?

There are many species of migrating birds such as geese etc, routinely fly as high as 10k-20k feet when migrating.

https://www.livescience.com/55455-how-high-can-birds-fly.html
Click to expand...

His focus is more on how the thing was moving and that it defied the known laws of physics. That's the most important thing and that's the thing that caught the attention of the military.

The thing that stood out to me the most was how erratic it was behaving. And what I mean by “erratic” is that its changes in altitude, air speed, and aspect were just unlike things that I’ve ever encountered before flying against other air targets. It was just behaving in ways that aren’t physically normal. That’s what caught my eye. Because, aircraft, whether they’re manned or unmanned, still have to obey the laws of physics. They have to have some source of lift, some source of propulsion. The Tic Tac was not doing that. It was going from like 50,000 feet to, you know, a hundred feet in like seconds, which is not possible.

And it was doing that during your engagement too?

Yes. That was the thing that was the most interesting to me: how erratic this thing was. If it was obeying physics like a normal object that you would encounter in the sky — an aircraft, or a cruise missile, or some sort of special project that the government didn’t tell you about — that would have made more sense to me. The part that drew our attention was how it wasn’t behaving within the normal laws of physics. You’re up there flying, like, “Okay. It’s not behaving in a manner that’s predictable or is normal by how flying objects physically move.”
Click to expand...
 
Screeeech said:
Yeah that would be the case if there was any actual evidence of it, but unfortunately there isn't - David Fravor and Alex Dietrich's words, nothing else. AFAIK - nobody has come forward and provided anything else over this apparent tictac encounter.

A far more likely and reasonable explanation, is that they're making it up for publicity, attention and cash (people do this every day, all over the world). Unless someone comes forward with any video or other more conclusive evidence of this tactac thing doing anything close to what was claimed, then I'm passing it off as lies.
Click to expand...

I can soon solve that dilemma for you,

Pilot Chad Underwood who filmed the TicTac is on record:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nymag....o-q-and-a-with-navy-pilot-chad-underwood.html

As well as 5 radar operators Gary Voorhis, Jason Turner, P.J. Hughes, Ryan Weigelt, and Kevin Day:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a29771548/navy-ufo-witnesses-tell-truth/

Then there is also Chief Master at-arms Sean Cahill who was also on the USS Princeton and witnessed the events.

 
Last edited:
I'm watching Brian Cox's latest series and the last 10 minutes of the latest one is about SETI and discussing life elsewhere, I'm firmly in his camp.
if Alien UFOs are flying all over Earth they would be detected.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
I'm watching Brian Cox's latest series and the last 10 minutes of the latest one is about SETI and discussing life elsewhere, I'm firmly in his camp.
if Alien UFOs are flying all over Earth they would be detected.
Click to expand...


Cox always says everything as fact when it's not.

We can't detect asteroids coming towards us, let alone a craft from a superior race.
 
MookJong said:
I can soon solve that dilemma for you,
Click to expand...

Forgive me, but all we have is a third person interview, no actual evidence that can be corroborated or verified.

Although this made me giggle;

Shortly after securing the data bricks, Hughes said he was visited by his commanding officer and two unknown individuals. “They were not on the ship earlier, and I didn’t see them come on. I’m not sure how they got there,” said Hughes of the two men.

According to Hughes, his commanding officer told him to turn over the recently secured harddrives. “We put them in the bags, he took them, then he and the two anonymous officers left,” Hughes said.
Click to expand...

Just throwing some MIB stuff in there, to wet the appetites of the conspiracy theorists and get them all slavering.

And also;

Voorhis tells Popular Mechanics that he, too, saw a much longer and clearer version of the ATFLIR video through the ship’s Top Secret LAN network. “I definitely saw video that was roughly 8 to 10 minutes long and a lot more clear,” Voorhis says.
Click to expand...

Why is it almost always the case, that there's a better sexier video, showing literally all of the things - but it always seems to go missing?... why is that?

Lysander said:
And if they did, do you not think the majority of people would pass it off as CGI? It would be utterly pointless.
Click to expand...

To be honest - it would be a start.

In the case of this "Tic Tac" it was apparently defying the laws of physics, moving from 50k feet to 100 feet in a few seconds or whatever, having any footage at all of it behaving in this manner would at least be a start.

Instead - what we actually have is several recordings of what appear to be A: A bird, B: something moving rather slowly - which does nothing out of the ordinary whatsoever.
 
Th0nt said:
Mate... https://twitter.com/lowflyingrocks

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Well of course we have a Near Earth Object program and the Torino Scale to measure such things.

But the point he's making is that we do miss them. Sometimes really important ones.

Then in 1989, a 300m-wide asteroid, 4581 Asclepius, avoided a collision with Earth by less than six hours. Had it struck, the devastation would have been equivalent to the detonation of over 1000 Hiroshima atom bombs.
Click to expand...

https://www.sciencefocus.com/planet-earth/the-days-that-could-change-earth/
 
="Screeeech, post: 34854932, member: 169143"
Why is it almost always the case, that there's a better sexier video, showing literally all of the things - but it always seems to go missing?... why is that?
Click to expand...

The rest of the videos and data as I'm sure you actually know are still classified.

For now we have to take the word of those who have seen them. But those who have seen them have been moved enough to get us to where we are today waiting for the UAPTF report.

If there is nothing to this then it is still the biggest story of the century, the fact that the Pentagon, NASA officials and right up to the whitehouse were completely fooled by some hoaxers claiming to see a giant flying breath mint.

You can only imagine the laughter in Moscow and Beijing when the truth comes out.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom