Pentagon releases UFO footage

Well of course we have a Near Earth Object program and the Torino Scale to measure such things.

But the point he's making is that we do miss them. Sometimes really important ones.

Is that all of them? :)

That was my point, he made it out like we cant detect them. Off the cuff statements like that are precisely why it gets highlighted.

That's like me saying 'The parcel delivery drivers cant deliver packages to me on time' when there's sites, apps, trackers and scanners making the feat very possible. Just because they are a few minutes early, late or lose the package is when you try to improve said systems. The tracking of packages is being done. Perhaps use better terms or word it differently.

The ultimate hypocrisy is slating Cox for saying everything is fact when its not.. pot calling kettle black comes to mind.
 
That was my point, he made it out like we cant detect them. Off the cuff statements like that are precisely why it gets highlighted.

That's like me saying 'The parcel delivery drivers cant deliver packages to me on time' when there's sites, apps, trackers and scanners making the feat very possible. Just because they are a few minutes early, late or lose the package is when you try to improve said systems. The tracking of packages is being done. Perhaps use better terms or word it differently.

The ultimate hypocrisy is slating Cox for saying everything is fact when its not.. pot calling kettle black comes to mind.
I think it was this video I watch recently that reminded me about this. We can detect asteroids but below a certain size we begin to struggle to spot them as they don't reflect enough light to be seen and catalogued. If its the size of family size car (standard alien spacecraft size obvs) we would probably miss it.
 
If there is nothing to this then it is still the biggest story of the century, the fact that the Pentagon, NASA officials and right up to the whitehouse were completely fooled by some hoaxers claiming to see a giant flying breath mint.

I don't think the US Govt has been fooled, because the Pentagon / NASA haven't really said anything at all about David Fravor's Tic Tac thing - because it was completely unrelated to the videos which were declassified. AFAIK all they've really said officially, is that the planes recorded the unidentified objects in the gofast/gimble videos, and they remain unidentified.
 
When exactly will the report be made public?
The legislation President Trump signed on December 27 said intelligence officials should submit their report within 180 days, which would fall in late June. But as the Washington Post reported, it may not arrive on time:

Two factors might delay the report’s release: Agencies have missed similar congressional reporting deadlines in the past; and the provision is not technically binding, as the language was included in the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report on the bill, not the bill itself.


“In other words, it isn’t statute, but the agencies/departments generally treat report language as bill language,” said one senior Senate aide familiar with the legislation.

Since the Senate Intelligence Committee called for an unclassified analysis, the report should eventually be available for all Americans to see. (A representative for committee chairman Mark Warner’s office could not provide an answer on how long the delay might be between the report’s delivery to the Committee and its release to the general public.) However, the legislation states that the report “may include a classified annex,” which could frustrate amateur UFO enthusiasts.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/pentagon-ufo-report-what-we-know.html

I wanna know when the report is out coz I don't wanna waste my time with a job interview on the Wednesday if an alien ascension is on the Friday.
 
The Pentagon report will be a "logical disclosure" in my opinion. We know it will say the majority of the 120 unexplained UAPTF cases could not be put down to US black technology. But more importantly I think it will also state it's highly unlikely to be a foreign nations technology either.

They will overtly imply the objects are not man made, but without point blank saying it.

This will allow the scientific community to be brought in to study again without the ridicule and stigma previously preventing them working on this in the open.

Whilst the report can state that they ("US") believe it isn't or it's unlikely to be foreign technology, they can't say that with absolute certain. Same as they can say it isn't US hardware as i doubt every US "Black" project was brought forward for this UAP report, if any at all - very few will know about them, even those working on them will unlikely know the whole project (typical of any military project).

I suspect the TLDR of it (DNI report) will be very much an anti-climax-back-to-square-one of "We recognise them but it's not (known; that everyone else knows about) US hardware and we don't know what they are." and we'll spend the decades going back around in circles.
 
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/anti-gravity-propulsion-technology-startup-proposes-graphene-kelly/

'Anti-Gravity' Propulsion Technology Startup Proposes Graphene, Carbon Nanotube Hydrogen Light Pump-Jet Thruster

https://www.suretyinsider.com/breakthrough-propulsion-physics-anti-gravity-technology.html


I guess what I'm saying is, who knows what experimental stuff we have that defies conventional aircraft?
But these "things" have been exhibiting advanced capabilities prior to 1945 so how does your point explain that?
 
But these "things" have been exhibiting advanced capabilities prior to 1945 so how does your point explain that?

That true, but how do you separate what is theirs and what is ours today?

Also I have mentioned this before, and I do think things often get mixed up.

Regarding top-secet projects, I think it's very real we have technologies that are beyond our public understanding, but the problem is when hysteria runs rampant.

A good example of hysteria running away with things is Roswell.

A scientist came forward several years ago who was involved in the Roswell incident. He revealed that the US government had developed a top secret project with the intention of listening to nuclear experiments from the Soviets. The technology used in the project involved sending up a large balloon with a payload that had a highly tuned microphone that was designed to detect nuclear explosions from 3000 miles away. The technology was based on ultrasound.

The codename for the project was incidentally called "flying disc" and unfortunately in testing the balloon got ripped to shreds in the atmosphere and crashed down in Roswell.

Afterwards, the Roswell airforce was then tasked to recover the crashed balloon. This was so that the Soviets did not discover that the US government had the technology to listen for Soviet nuclear bomb testing.

However due to the press and media relentlessly trying to find out what the crash was, they did partly uncover the project name "flying disc". But the name "flying disc" then became "flying saucer" due to the media trying to make headline stories and sell newspapers, and then it just took off into a form of its own which became a completely different version of events. But the US government didn't mind, because it distracted people from what the real secret was.
 
That true, but how do you separate what is theirs and what is ours today?
do we have materials that can handle thousands of G forces?

let's say we learned the propulsion from aliens or whatever, would we be able to replicate their craft or would we end up with a craft limited by our materials that basically wouldn't be able to do anything but move really fast in a straight line, then slowly stop again.

let's say you goto the 1930s and give them some uber modern jet engine or rocket engine that can go supersonic.

most the planes that were wood and canvas? the materials they could build from would stupidly limit the abilities of the engine?
 
Cox always says everything as fact when it's not.

.

Well I disagree, this series he is looking back at what he said years ago to what we know now.
If he said things as FACT then he certainly wouldn't make a series like this.
As a scientist he absolutely knows the goalposts change.

But... they have been detected? Hence the investigation and report.

They've actually detected Aliens?
When?
 
Well I disagree, this series he is looking back at what he said years ago to what we know now.
If he said things as FACT then he certainly wouldn't make a series like this.
As a scientist he absolutely knows the goalposts change.


Exactly my point.
Nothing is fact.
The very things that make life on earth came from comets\planets colliding with earth.
 

rofl jesus wept.

Basically what you have here is a scam - someone talking absolute nonsense whilst high, passed off as some sort of inventor - just trying to get people to give them money, it's absolute pure nonsense.
 
do we have materials that can handle thousands of G forces?

.

Quite possibly, yes. We do not know what top technology we have these days.

As for comparisons with the 1930s and 1940s, i have not seen any clear evidence that what was seen in those days is the same gravity defying technology. We have no evidence. We have evidence today from the US Navy, but we have nothing to back up what was seen in the 1930, 40s etc, was exactly the same. We have eye witness reports and grainy photos. So many things could have been mistaken for so many other things based on that evidence. I used the Roswell incident to give you an example of possible hysteria making the narrative more exciting than it really is.
 
They've actually detected Aliens?
When?

You know what he's trying to say, you melt, they have detected technology which could be alien. Because they - these craft - harness technology which we haven't [as far as we know]. In the very least, if there are craft which could move in alieny ways, it would be something like what has been witnessed.
 
Back
Top Bottom