Man of Honour
I remember when I went to the Colosseum in Rome in 2004, was shocked how small it was, mentioned this to one of the guides who promptly told me people were a lot smaller back then.
Romans were. Not people in general. There are a fair few surviving references to many of the northern barbarian tribes averaging a fair bit taller than Romans. Average height of ancient Roman men was about 5 feet 6 and a half inches IIRC. The Colosseum was built for Romans, of course (and to fit as many people as possible in).
I've seen some people simply translate pes and uncia as feet and inches. I think that's a misleading translation because most people nowadays think of feet and inches as British imperial feet and inches (USA feet and inches are the same). There were various different values for the same sort of unit. Roman pes and uncia were a bit shorter than British imperial feet and inches. So if you look around and see references to average ancient Roman height for men being more like 5'9" or 5'10", that's why. It's also partly why Napoleon is famous for being extremely short. He wasn't unusually short, but French feet and inches were a bit longer than British feet and inches.
EDIT: As an example, Vegetius refers to height in De Re Militari when referring to the selection of soldiers. English translations usually state "6 feet or at least 5 feet 10 inches", but the original Latin clearly states "VI pedum uel certe V et X unciarum". pes and uncia, not feet and inches. About 5'8" in British imperial feet and inches. Which is clearly stated by Vegetius to be tall for a Roman man. It's also clearly stated that it should be treated as a guideline and not as a requirement.
Last edited: