Caporegime
The search for the elusive aliens continues. Amazing that they visit us so regularly, but never make contact with any of our governments or local authorities. How strange!
Pentagon releases UFO footage
- Thread starter Doobedoo
- Start date
I'm gladly paying money for the film, I might get the directors cut as to trim it to 90 mins he left a lot on the cutting room floor. I was listening to a podcast and the film maker has put spent a good sum of his money and the banks as he wanted to keep control over the editorial aspects.
i wouldn't either, to be honest.The search for the elusive aliens continues. Amazing that they visit us so regularly, but never make contact with any of our governments or local authorities. How strange!
Man of Honour
Is this the ones of the kids in Africa?
If it is I saw a debunking of this many years ago.
Caporegime
It's amazing that once everyone started having access to decent definition video taking, sightings dropped off a cliff.The search for the elusive aliens continues. Amazing that they visit us so regularly, but never make contact with any of our governments or local authorities. How strange!
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,714
It's funny, but actually if you try taking a decent video of a plane it's almost impossible. My pixel 6 pro can't, so unless you get very lucky and have some specialist equipment we're stick with pixelated videos.
That said, there are thousands of satellites pointing back at the earth, some which can video a 5p coin on a road. You'd like to think one of those has captured something other than a bird.
Man of Honour
I'm calling bull, taken earlier today on my wife's cheap Motorola and they were fast
Here's an highly compressed video -
Last edited:
Associate
They don't, they just repeat the same cgi footage. Alien's don't have enough cgi budget.The search for the elusive aliens continues. Amazing that they visit us so regularly, but never make contact with any of our governments or local authorities. How strange!
a quote from science there.
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,714
Yeah that's pretty decent actually. Certainly better than my attempt. You'd have thought someone would have caught something by now.I'm calling bull, taken earlier today on my wife's cheap Motorola and they were fast
Here's an highly compressed video -
Man of Honour
It's a recurring myth that mobile phones can't take decent pictures of things in the sky.
UFO pictures aren't usually floating 1000s of feet up in the air but usually not that far from the ground as in the example above.
My wife takes terrible pictures and normally cuts peoples heads off but it was done on a £120 Motorola.
Man of Honour
I've no doubt there must be other life out there but intelligent could be stretching it.
It's quite possible there might have been but to occur at exactly the same time as us and being able to reach us is doubtful.
You just proved the UFO people right. It looks like they are flying relatively low and slow and you failed to capture them in any meaningful detail. That looks no different to the UFO photos and videos and the only reason we can tell they are planes is the general shape not from any detail. If they had some other shape we wouldn't be able to tell what they are from that video or photo. I don't see how you can call that a decent photo of something in the sky. You have a blurred zero detail black blob with a general outline only. Just imagine if those planes didn't have wings. They would have been impossible to identify from that photo.I'm calling bull, taken earlier today on my wife's cheap Motorola and they were fast
Here's an highly compressed video -
Man of Honour
You need to read #1767, the bit that says "It's funny, but actually if you try taking a decent video of a plane it's almost impossible" which is what I replied to.
Apologies accepted.
So you posted a pixelated video to prove that its possible to take a none pixelated video? You seem to have proved the other person correct in that its near impossible to get a decent video/picture.
Man of Honour
Don't back track, he accepted it was ok and I gave him a very compressed version to look at. You could still tell it was planes.
The pic grab was a better quality.
He might accept it but I don't so there is no backtracking. The only reason we can tell its a plane is because we are familiar with the black outline shape of a plane and so we can make a safe assumption on what it is from the blurred outline. The actual footage is blurred, lacking in detail and just a pixelated black object so unless we are familiar with the outline of the object we cannot tell what it is. We cannot tell its a plane beyond the outline we are familiar with. If it wasn't a familiar shaped outline we wouldn't have a clue what it is. As I said before if those planes didn't have wings and we only had the core body in the photo/video we would be clueless on what the object was. Which is why its so hard to tell what UFO's are as its next to impossible to get decent footage as your video proves where you couldn't get decent footage of a low and slow flying plane. Your photo is the equivalent of a black blurred outline UFO photo without any detail. In short if those planes in your video where an unfamiliar shape you would be clueless on what they are as you have no detail.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,650
You would think somebody would have caught a UFO with one of these cameras
That looks like a planed shot with specialist equipment preset up in a known flight path with a special 83× zoom lens which is bigger then most peoples phones. At the moment a video like that cannot be done handhold without warning with everyday equipment. It also wasn't a mobile phone camera but a £1000+ standalone camera and that's the best they could do.
Last edited: