Firestar_3x said:Ahhhh, interesting hopefully he will get more joy with this one, current car (Jokes aside) seems to have caused him quite a few problems.
agw_01 said:You've gotta be joking me Si?
0-60 of the 220 is what, 8 seconds? Not to mention the mahoosive increase in torque. I went to Leeds today and had to hammer it up hills in 3rd and 4th gear to even maintain my speed.
And I'm sure you've seen the quotes I've been getting for the 220. The Turbo is just WAYYYYYY out of the question at the moment.
And surely the turbo handles worse than the 220? Anyway, I've got these 50mm springs that I'm saving for it![]()
agw_01 said:Well, you were talking about more weight at the front so worse handling... the GSi-T has a turbo, intercooler and piping to carry around.
So you're honestly saying that if you could swap your 214 for a 220 NASP you wouldn't go for it?
You should know better - nothing you do on here will please anyoneagw_01 said:Si, when you say 220, do you mean NASP or Turbo?
Trust me, I'd still love the Turbo and when I do get to drive one I'll be gutted I didn't save up. But I'm not prepared to get raped by the insurance and repair bills just to own one. I just can't afford it at the moment.
I would have thought that you would be at least a little bit happy that I'd decided not to blow all my money on a 1.4 and get a good base car like the 220.
agw_01 said:Hmmm, right, I've been finding it pretty easy to get quotes of under £1400 for the GSi, so that had me thinking...
NUD might be saying to call them just based on the fact that it's a group 13 car. Their quote might not be that expensive, especially as how they were quoting me £775 for the 214. I reckon it would be around £1200 for the new car.
I guess the only way to find out is to ring them![]()