PlusNet now want to arrange a second engineer visit regarding low speeds on FTTC. They haven't accepted the first guys explanation of 'it's a long way from the main pole' and say the fault is still present.
Here's the first engineers comments, can anyone interpret whether the attenuation figures correspond to distance? I've driven the route the overhead wires take and it's 1500m to the green cabinet exactly.
Engineers Comments
Service restored, FastTest2 and Eclipse test OK and demonstrated to EU Pqt failed due to Huawei vccm cards fitted due dslam, cct in synch at 0.8/8meg, this is slightly below predicted values as property is approx 0.5km beyond dp, service test completed ok with no errors, line loss 36.7db, ac balance 57db
Summary
Rejected clear in BTW, as fault is still present.
Here's the first engineers comments, can anyone interpret whether the attenuation figures correspond to distance? I've driven the route the overhead wires take and it's 1500m to the green cabinet exactly.
Engineers Comments
Service restored, FastTest2 and Eclipse test OK and demonstrated to EU Pqt failed due to Huawei vccm cards fitted due dslam, cct in synch at 0.8/8meg, this is slightly below predicted values as property is approx 0.5km beyond dp, service test completed ok with no errors, line loss 36.7db, ac balance 57db
Summary
Rejected clear in BTW, as fault is still present.