Im closer to Porsche ownership - they sent me a calender:
I think my 10k would go on an E46 M3 - similar performace, better interior, more practical and probably cheaper to run.
Although you can't tell people you drive a 9-11.
Wow. It really shows how much driver skill makes a difference to lap times. He flys up on the back of GT3 cup cars despite them having the same BHP. I guess he didnt win the 2006 GT3 cup by being slow! (thanks wiki)
Hmm, im getting tempted to do a driver training day in the cayman now. How much punishment will the tyres/brakes take? I was thinking of Bedford for the safety factor and its not that far from me.
What's the latest thinking on PSS vs PS2, given their lack of an N Rating?
I'm currently running PS2s on a Boxster 987S in the following sizes
235/35/19 87Y
265/35/19 94Y
PSS are not N rated and available in my size, but with the wrong load rating:-
235/35/19 91Y
265/35/19 98Y
Should I be concerned that in fitting PSS they're A; not N rated, & B; the wrong load index?
I've no OPC warranty to influence the decision, just looking for the best tyre, which seems to be more complicated than I'd have hoped given that the PS2 is not exactly new, and Michelin/Porsche have yet to get their act together and produce an ideal replacement.
@Peerzy, you're running a 987S on 18's, with an OPC warranty. What size/load rating are your tyres?
What are the downsides? Harsher ride quality? If there were no downsides, surely it'd come with the highest possible load rating as standard?
There seems to be an even split between people who think N rating is gospel, and those who think it's bobbins.
Personally I can't understand how an N rated tyre could be different from a non N-rated version of the same tyre? I got to thinking that it might be down to load ratings and just a specification compliance thing, but then I'm already running outside of standard spec in having PASM & 19s... That's why I wondered what Peerzy's load ratings were on 18s?
Have you had both PS2s & PSS on your C2S?
The settings were done by JZM to one of their tack settings, with some road and it was too raw which is why I had Fearnsport take it back to a more sensible setting. It did lose something in that, but was a better road car for it.
This is who I was suggesting you use for instruction...goes well does Sheds.
or just get in touch yourself via http://news.seanedwards.eu
I'd leave it at the moment, he's in Dubai prepping for the 24 hours and I think right now has is hands a little full...
I'm only running a Boxster, but tuition is relevant to my interests...
Official Porsche track day?
My GT3 settings aren't far off and it drives very nicely and a little more planted than standard settings. I run 2 deg front and rear. No toe front and a little toe in at the rear. ARBs both in the middle.
Is the PASM really worth it?
...and it lowers the car by an inch or two which makes it look much better.
Non-PASM cars are fine, but are neither perfect for road nor track. Not that PASM doesn't have it foibles though.
Saw a GT3 RS for a bout 2 seconds as it blurred past me this morning. Orange with orange wheels and everything. Made a right racket, that thing must've had a different exhaust setup.
Gt3 revs higher than a normal 911 and the sound change is around 5500
Yah OPC now charge 2k for the PSE alone but I think I can get the parts for much less on ebay.
Something like this
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Porsche-9...arts_Vehicles_CarParts_SM&hash=item3a7d8b5415
the above is missing the PASM but one will come along.