• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Boomstick777 said:
So rumoured spec,

128 ROPs: Titan X = 96
256 TMUs: Titan X = 192
4GB / 8GB HBM 512 GB/s / 640GB/s Bandwidth: Titan X = 336.6 GB/s
8.5 GFLOPS Floating Performance: Titan X = 6,144 GFLOPS

Less pessimism and more excitement plz, this card could be an absolute monster !

9 days to go.
Click to expand...

If true I will be watching the 4GB HBM benchmarks like a hawk before the 8GB version release.

Sadly crossfire will probably **** me off.
 
africanos23 said:
If true I will be watching the 4GB HBM benchmarks like a hawk before the 8GB version release.

Sadly crossfire will probably **** me off.
Click to expand...

I agree about crossfire mate, I always had better experience with SLI. Although in the end I gave up as my eyes really sensitive to micro stutter. So both SLI and Crossfire are no choice for me. So now just want the best single GPU available.

Win win for me because if it's slower than Titan X I can keep my card with no hassle and if it's faster I'll switch and enjoy the AMD card. It's great when your not attached to either brand :D

If I was running dual cards I would likely stick with Nvidia. Does anybody know if Direct X12 will fix things like micro stutter, i.e because the GPU's function as one GPU with shared pooled memory etc?
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
4096 Shaders.

+ 45% Shaders
+ 100% ROP's
+ 80/100% Memory Bandwidth

#2x + Tessellation Throughput
#Delta Colour Compression
#Texture Compression

How something like that can be slower than the 980TI makes no sense to me, its a monster!
Click to expand...

That's what I don't understand, hopefully its the performance rumours that are wrong and not the specs, unless of course it really is a wet lettuce, which in its self makes no sense. Its not as if AMD are suddenly going to forget how to make decent GPU's.
 
Lets get some perspective.



Fury needs 39% over the 290X to match the 980TI (72 + 39% = 100)

290X
2818 Shaders @ 1000Mhz
64 ROP's
320 GB/s

Fury-X
Shaders: 4096 (+45%)
1050Mhz (+5%)
128 ROP's (+100%)
512 GB/s (+60%)

Extras
#2x + Tessellation Throughput
#Delta Colour Compression
#Texture Compression

How can it not catch the 980TI?
 
bru said:
That's what I don't understand, hopefully its the performance rumours that are wrong and not the specs, unless of course it really is a wet lettuce, which in its self makes no sense. Its not as if AMD are suddenly going to forget how to make decent GPU's.
Click to expand...

AMD have been so quiet, not responded to any 'leaks' very little hype from themselves. Only a few teasers to remind people something new is coming.

So any performance rumour cannot be legitimized.

Maybe they are going to let the hardware speak for itself at the reveal? I.e when AMD don't hype things seem to be good. AMD + Hype usually ends badly. AMD aren't the ones hyping this launch, so I'm optimistic they are being quietly confident. Not showing anyone the Fury X makes me think it's performance is very good for this reason.
 
Last edited:
Boomstick777 said:
I agree about crossfire mate, I always had better experience with SLI. Although in the end I gave up as my eyes really sensitive to micro stutter. So both SLI and Crossfire are no choice for me. So now just want the best single GPU available.

Win win for me because if it's slower than Titan X I can keep my card with no hassle and if it's faster I'll switch and enjoy the AMD card. It's great when your not attached to either brand :D

If I was running dual cards I would likely stick with Nvidia. Does anybody know if Direct X12 will fix things like micro stutter, i.e because the GPU's function as one GPU with shared pooled memory etc?
Click to expand...

I'm also really sensitive to it and use to get migrains and my eyes would hurt on older cards.

In terms of microstutter with the TXs I haven't felt any whatsoever (Witcher 3, COD AW and GTA V). It feels exactly like a single card does strangely.
 
africanos23 said:
I'm also really sensitive to it and use to get migrains and my eyes would hurt on older cards.

In terms of microstutter with the TXs I haven't felt any whatsoever (Witcher 3, COD AW and GTA V). It feels exactly like a single card does strangely.
Click to expand...

Ha, don't say that I'll end up buying another :p

Next 9 days can't go quick enough..
 
In terms of teraflops 290x has 9% less than a titan x although has -33% performance in overall gaming performance.

With 34% more teraflops than a 290x, fury should, in theory, be able to match titan x or slightly beat it.
 
As a neutral I am loving all this build up! The lack of news from AMD has me wondering however...

Option 1: Nvidia are well aware that AMD have something very good on its way and are trying to out hype it through panic whilst AMD sit quietly grinning, just waiting for release to left the hardware speak for itself.

Option 2: AMD have realised somewhere along the line that they simply cannot match the 980ti's performance and are desperately trying to tweak things at the last minute so don't have the specs/time to flaunt in the media.

Either way, all this on top of fallout 4 is making it a very exciting time :D
 
Hiijinx said:
As a neutral I am loving all this build up! The lack of news from AMD has me wondering however...

Option 1: Nvidia are well aware that AMD have something very good on its way and are trying to out hype it through panic whilst AMD sit quietly grinning, just waiting for release to left the hardware speak for itself.

Option 2: AMD have realised somewhere along the line that they simply cannot match the 980ti's performance and are desperately trying to tweak things at the last minute so don't have the specs/time to flaunt in the media.

Either way, all this on top of fallout 4 is making it a very exciting time :D
Click to expand...

Lets all hope it's option 1. Saying that what worries me is AMD have done this once before with the 2900 series and after all the waiting and bickering it turned out to be a flop.
 
Hiijinx said:
As a neutral I am loving all this build up! The lack of news from AMD has me wondering however...

Option 1: Nvidia are well aware that AMD have something very good on its way and are trying to out hype it through panic whilst AMD sit quietly grinning, just waiting for release to left the hardware speak for itself.

Option 2: AMD have realised somewhere along the line that they simply cannot match the 980ti's performance and are desperately trying to tweak things at the last minute so don't have the specs/time to flaunt in the media.

Either way, all this on top of fallout 4 is making it a very exciting time :D
Click to expand...

The second is highly unlikely...the TitanX performance is known for 3 months for everyone, and i bet amd knew it months before that...so while there's a slim chance that they waited for two weeks before release and just now started to fix the performance, i really doubt that. They had a good few months to tweak the cards.

For me the 980Ti early release and price tells that NV trying to grab sales and users before Fiji hits the market because they knew it would hurt their sales
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom