• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
How is "news/leaks" of the 390X being nothing but a 290X rebrand with 8GB RAM building hype :p?

That will actually make people go Nvidia.

Agreed, stuff like this should be addressed. I get the silence on new flagship tech being held back for big E3 launch, but being silent on this just makes me think these are straight up rebrands. Weakens the line up in most peoples eyes.

If the price is good though an 8GB 290X / 390X might still be good, in the face of the GTX 970 3.5GB +0.5GB etc, but still another rebrand... Meh..
 
http://videocardz.com/56145/xfx-radeon-r9-390x-pictured
R9_390_X_8_DF_1.jpg

R9_390_X_8_DF_2.jpg

R9_390_X_8_DF_3.jpg

R9_390_X_8_DFR_4.jpg

Apparently the best place to look for leaks is the XFX website. The Radeon R9 390X, which is in fact slightly faster R9 290X equipped with 8GB memory, can be found on their website under .. R9 290X product page.

No it isn't http://xfxforce.com/en-us/products/amd-radeon-r9-series#290X
 
The 390X being a 290X can't ever be span positively Boom lol. Not that it matters, because there's no way on hell that's the case. But that's my point, AMD should perhaps reassess the situation, given we're 9 days off, just give official specs, that's it.
 
The 390X being a 290X can't ever be span positively Boom lol. Not that it matters, because there's no way on hell that's the case. But that's my point, AMD should perhaps reassess the situation, given we're 9 days off, just give official specs, that's it.

Yeah I don't think you read my posts sometimes. I was agreeing with you.

Agreed, stuff like this should be addressed. I get the silence on new flagship tech being held back for big E3 launch, but being silent on this just makes me think these are straight up rebrands. Weakens the line up in most peoples eyes.

If the price is good though an 8GB 290X / 390X might still be good, in the face of the GTX 970 3.5GB +0.5GB etc, but still another rebrand... Meh..

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regarding price though, if the 390X 8GB came in at £250 VS a GTX 970 3.5GB + 0.5GB it might have a place.

Still rebranding after nearly two years = Meh

Well if that xfx card turns out to be legit looks like wccftech got a legit leak back in April of it! Shows these have been in the pipeline for awhile

http://wccftech.com/xfx-radeon-r9-390-double-dissipation-allegedly-pictured/

Indeed, all they had to do is swap the stickers though. Technically these 390X's have been around since 2013 :p
 
The 390X being a 290X can't ever be span positively Boom lol. Not that it matters, because there's no way on hell that's the case. But that's my point, AMD should perhaps reassess the situation, given we're 9 days off, just give official specs, that's it.

Well given that we're 9 days off and 980ti stock is about as plentiful as hens teeth, and also factoring in the backlog of people waiting that's not going to change anytime soon. Waiting the 9 days isn't that big of a deal.
 
Bad Photoshop job this one - look at the edges of the "box". Obviously someone just made a design and used the transform tools to make it look vaguely right. Anyone with somewhat decent Photoshop skills could make a much more convincing fake.

There is no reason to fake a box :p The real question is what is under the hood :D
 
I'm going to wait for the real details of the 390x Fury before deciding on a 980 Ti. I also think that the new flagship card the Fury should have its own name and lose the 390x part that the 290x rebrands have now got.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom