• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Boomstick777 said:
http://videocardz.com/56145/xfx-radeon-r9-390x-pictured

R9_390_X_8_DF_1.jpg

R9_390_X_8_DF_2.jpg

R9_390_X_8_DF_3.jpg

R9_390_X_8_DFR_4.jpg
Click to expand...

its a fake, its nothing like the 390x XFX gave me to test
 
I find it hilarious that there are still people who think that the 390X is going to be some GCN 1.2 based redone hawaii made at glofo.

It's just 3rd party 290Xs with higher density / upgraded memory chips and slightly higher core clocks.
 
_Alatar_ said:
I find it hilarious that there are still people who think that the 390X is going to be some GCN 1.2 based redone hawaii made at glofo.

It's just 3rd party 290Xs with higher density / upgraded memory chips and slightly higher core clocks.
Click to expand...

I find your nvidiocy hilarious.
 
I'm just following the proof. If that's being an nvidiot then I'll gladly accept the label.

Do remember that there's zero proof of glofo, there's zero proof of any new chip, there's zero proof of efficiency improvements while at the same time:

-device IDs in leaked drivers are for hawaii cards
-leaked benches are showing exactly the kind of performance you'd expect from hawaii with slightly higher core and mem clocks
-codexl only new chip is Fiji
-vendors are using identical PCBs as 290 series cards, some even including 390X pics on their 290X product pages
 
_Alatar_ said:
I'm just following the proof. If that's being an nvidiot then I'll gladly accept the label.

Do remember that there's zero proof of glofo, there's zero proof of any new chip, there's zero proof of efficiency improvements while at the same time:

-device IDs in leaked drivers are for hawaii cards
-leaked benches are showing exactly the kind of performance you'd expect from hawaii with slightly higher core and mem clocks
-codexl only new chip is Fiji
-vendors are using identical PCBs as 290 series cards, some even including 390X pics on their 290X product pages
Click to expand...

The only leaked bench showed around 12-15% improvement with 5% more clocks. Vendors using the same pcb could as well mean upgraded chip.
 
The dev IDs will be the same so that you can Crossfire them with 290s. AMD have always allowed rebrands to work with their older counterparts.
 
_Alatar_ said:
I'm just following the proof. If that's being an nvidiot then I'll gladly accept the label.

Do remember that there's zero proof of glofo, there's zero proof of any new chip, there's zero proof of efficiency improvements while at the same time:

-device IDs in leaked drivers are for hawaii cards
-leaked benches are showing exactly the kind of performance you'd expect from hawaii with slightly higher core and mem clocks
-codexl only new chip is Fiji
-vendors are using identical PCBs as 290 series cards, some even including 390X pics on their 290X product pages
Click to expand...

It's a hard pill to swallow that's why lol. For a select few at least. Shouldn't really matter to most browsing this thread, this isn't the card they're looking for. *Jedi Mind Trick*
 
Last edited:
If they do release 3 Fiji cards then I suppose a rebrand isn't to bad as it will be the 4th card on the range, if not we need a GCN 1.2/3 part to beat GTX 980.
 
How could they even price a 290X rebrand? I expect we'll get a 290X rebrand, but it'd be the 380 (At a guess), we need at least 2 new GPU's (390/390X), and with Fury, should make 3.

But I'm pessimistic as hell.
 
_Alatar_ said:
-device IDs in leaked drivers are for hawaii cards
Click to expand...

You always bring this up and it never pans out.

_Alatar_ said:
-leaked benches are showing exactly the kind of performance you'd expect from hawaii
Click to expand...

The same type of benchmarks you wouldn't allow anyone to believe when they showed NV in a bad light.

_Alatar_ said:
-vendors are using identical PCBs as 290 series cards
Click to expand...

Already been debunked.

Keep gobbling up those wccf scraps. How the **** are you a mod anywhere.

Into the ignore list you go.

** Removed as this is baiting **
 
Last edited:
So many wild theories.. its like reading a British crime novel. Im looking forward to the end result and the millions of posts pointing fingers at those who were mistaken :P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom