Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

ubersonic · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:03

D.P. said:
$649 is the 980TI RRP in the US so you can figure 980Ti pricing in the UK.

Pretty cool considering that the 980ti has a £100+ premium on the AIO model.

sprite- · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:03

I own a Gigabyte 3x Windy 290x currently.

Personally i take everything that Nvidia or AMD say at launch with a pinch of salt, until i see a couple of reviews with real world benchmarks both at stock and OC'd. Even then, i typically like to wait for third party versions before i purchase.

If the Fury X turns out to beat the 980Ti - i'll buy it as soon as the dust settles and OC'd versions start dropping from the likes of Gigabyte.. All ready for Oculus Rift release Q1 2016

.

easyrider · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:03

Jono8 said:
Why is everyone getting so excited? I am not sure I am following.

AMD are releasing a card that MIGHT match a 980Ti...for the same money, with a higher TDP.

Linky to where you know this so called fact ?

LoadsaMoney · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:03

The size of that Nano :cool:

D.P. · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:04

Jono8 said:
Why is everyone getting so excited? I am not sure I am following.

AMD are releasing a card that MIGHT match a 980Ti...for the same money, with a higher TDP.

Exactly, I just can't understand the excitement.

We have to wait for reviews but what you say seems to be the liekly scenario, 980Ti performance, for 980Ti prices that consumer similar or slightly more power. But only 4GB of memory.

That is good and a welcome move by AMD but it is hardly ground breaking.

TNA · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:04

Ayahuasca said:
The Fury X is a single GPU, AMD drivers are absolutely spot on for most single card users and for a lot of crossfire users bar those who play a select few games.

+1

For example, if you play Elite, dont bother with CrossFire. Witcher 3 still not working 100% right on CrossFire yet either .

Completed Crysis 3 and playing Tomb Raider now and they very smooth at 4k on my 295x2. I am surprised actually, thought CrossFire was not as good as it is with what everyone was saying. Basically once they get drivers working eventually, you get a nice experience with CrossFire.

That said, single card is still best, no need to mess about, just play from day one.

mururoa · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:04

https://twitter.com/amd_roy/status/610260393508802560

savagesam117 · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:04

What did I miss? :O

Simon Belmont · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:04

All this talk about how much better the fury x is next to 980Ti or Titan X. where's the benchmark between these cards?

easyrider · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:05

D.P. said:
Exactly, I just can't understand the excitement.

We have to wait for reviews but what you say seems to be the liekly scenario, 980Ti performance, for 980Ti prices that consumer similar or slightly more power. But only 4GB of memory.

That is good and a welcome move by AMD but it is hardly ground breaking.

Stop posting bs.

mmj_uk · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:05

The Nano will get much of its 'power efficiency' just from having clockspeeds and voltages reduced, they won't be able to do that on the Fury. They'll probably cut it down as well so they can shift the imperfect dies.

Aurhinius · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:05

Thought the 980Ti rrp was 699$?

TNA · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:05

LoadsaMoney said:
The size of that Nano

I know right, nearly matches my **** in size. lol

Simon Belmont · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:05

easyrider said:
Linky to where you know this so called fact ?

AMD have given no facts either?

Nutella33 · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:06

*turns enthoo luxe ambient light to Red to celebrate*

Jono8 · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:06

easyrider said:
Linky to where you know this so called fact ?

What fact?

I'm just commenting on the absurd "ZOMG AMD's KILLED IT" pages from about an hour ago that made me want to vomit in my mouth

I don't understand why everyone is so excited?

We so far know the Fury X is the same price as the 980Ti and uses a bit more power. So people are excited about a card coming out that costs the same but costs slightly more pennys to run and lumbers you with an AIO water cooler (which you may or may not want)

I suspect AMD would be shouting to the rooftops if it was the fastest GPU on the planet but they haven't, which makes me doubt we have a 980Ti/Titan X killer coming out.

kylew_is_back · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:06

specs for the fury nano ?
also is going to be faster than the GTX980 ?

ubersonic · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:06

sprite- said:
If the Fury X turns out to beat the 980Ti

If? They are pricing it against the 980ti and the 980ti has 50% more VRAM, it's going to beat it (well either that or AMD have been at the funny fags).

Craterloads · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:06

Don't understand stand the range

r9 370
r9 380
r9 390

Fury
Fury X
Nano

Are the 3xx branded cards just rebrands of 2xx? any differences?

Fury and fury x are new HBM 4GB Cards, with the X being the liquid cooled version of the standard fury?

And the nano, is that HMB Fiji too?

D.P. · 16 Jun 2015 at 19:06

easyrider said:
You've just made all this up....you have no more idea than the rest of us...

No, AMD have announced what the price will be and how the power efficiency is. This is just basic facts.

Exact performance will have to wait for reviews but form the presention we can get a good idea.