• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ayahuasca said:
The normal Fury will probably be the best price/performance wise. Depends how close they are, if it's only a few percent then most will go for the Fury.

Clever release schedule though as with the Fury X coming first a lot of people waiting on the normal Fury may bite and just spend the extra $100 on the X.
Click to expand...

Yeah the normal Fury could well be. The Fury X should be much more attractive to people who don't mind an AIO - judging from what the AMD reps said it should have very good overclocking potential uninhibited by heat constraints that would most likely hit an air cooled version pretty hard.
 
Jono8 said:
What fact?

I'm just commenting on the absurd "ZOMG AMD's KILLED IT" pages from about an hour ago that made me want to vomit in my mouth :p

We so far know the Fury X is the same price as the 980Ti and uses a bit more power. I suspect AMD would be shouting to the rooftops if it was the fastest GPU on the planet but they haven't, which makes me doubt we have a 980Ti/Titan X killer coming out.
Click to expand...

Speculation....
 
Looks like all performance was defined in relation to the 290x, so I guess what we have is this :

- Fury X = 1.5x 290x performance - $649 - up to 275w power consumption - very good AIO cooling making it quiet and cool.

- Fury = ?x 290x performance - $549 - up to ?w power consumption - triple fan air cooling.

- Fury Nano = maybe 110% 290x performance? - ?$ - up to 145w power consumption - presumably pretty quiet even with it's single fan.

So where does all this leave us ?
- How does 1.5 X 290x performance compare to 980Ti & Titan ?
- How fast will the normal Fury be ?
- How much will the Nano cost ?
- What will be the problem (if any) with 4GB HBM ?

My feeling is the above puts AMD back in the game, rather being a killer blow to NVidia's line-up.
To me the Nano looks like the most impressive thing, priced right it will fly off the shelves & OEMs are going to love it.
Pretty impressed overall.
 
D.P. said:
The 2x8pin and water cooling certainly is a course for concern.
The only way that makes sense is even if their core is 1.5x as efficient as the 290X they have pushed things to crazy limits to try to meet or beat the Titan X
Click to expand...

Yeah amble cooling and proper power delivery is a concern.. we better starve the card and voltage limit its nutts off. we dont want to OC thats for sure.

Weird logic some of you peeps have.. Im not saying its not going to be a hot card but so is the titan X and so is the 980ti.. i know i have one. I would have loved for the 980ti to come from nvidia with AIO water cooling at 650 bucks..but guess what .. aint gonna happen..
 
AMD have investors, and they can't afford to be making claims like "most powerful gpu in the world" without it being true for some if not majority of tests.

HBM memory is very expensive, so this is a great showing by them. If it does smash the titan x to piece then nvidia's strategy will be undone.

I have no allegiances, but the reviews will be the real test. This liquid cooling could be vital during the boost / uber modes.
 
Jono8 said:
What fact?

I'm just commenting on the absurd "ZOMG AMD's KILLED IT" pages from about an hour ago that made me want to vomit in my mouth :p I don't understand why everyone is so excited?

We so far know the Fury X is the same price as the 980Ti and uses a bit more power. So people are excited about a card coming out that costs the same but costs slightly more pennys to run and lumbers you with an AIO water cooler (which you may or may not want)

I suspect AMD would be shouting to the rooftops if it was the fastest GPU on the planet but they haven't, which makes me doubt we have a 980Ti/Titan X killer coming out.
Click to expand...

OMG this^ Someone talking sense
 
D.P. said:
No, AMD have announced what the price will be and how the power efficiency is. This is just basic facts.


Exact performance will have to wait for reviews but form the presention we can get a good idea.
Click to expand...

No you can create what you want to hear in your own head...

Fact is you just don't know so it's bs.
 
Hoping this will drive down GPU prices a bit, not sure which way I'm going to jump until there are some proper benchmarks out there.
 
Craterloads said:
Don't understand stand the range

r9 370
r9 380
r9 390

Fury
Fury X
Nano

Are the 3xx branded cards just rebrands of 2xx? any differences?

Fury and fury x are new HBM 4GB Cards, with the X being the liquid cooled version of the standard fury?

And the nano, is that HMB Fiji too?
Click to expand...

Yes, exact differences will be found through reviews and testing when the cards come to retail.
 
nvidias strategy will be undone?

HBM2 is 7 months away according to road map for pascal.

nvidias strategy worked perfectly get everything out before AMD then if AMD wins oh well.
 
D.P. said:
IF facts are BS to you then maybe you should buy a dictionary?
Or do you not believe what AMD has announced and their cards are actually better than their marketing people are saying?
Click to expand...

Truth is no one knows just how fast the fury x is...including you


You get me blud ?:D
 
TwsT said:
nvidias strategy will be undone?

HBM2 is 7 months away according to road map for pascal.

nvidias strategy worked perfectly get everything out before AMD then if AMD wins oh well.
Click to expand...

Which means they will replace the Titan X within 10 months?? I doubt it. AMD has been working with Hynix for a few years on HBM - there were prototype GPUs with the HBM on an interposer package a few years ago.

It also means AMD might be faster to get HBM2 implemented on its next range of GPUs too,especially those lower down the range,especially if HBM2 is cheaper.
 
TwsT said:
nvidias strategy will be undone?

HBM2 is 7 months away according to road map for pascal.

nvidias strategy worked perfectly get everything out before AMD then if AMD wins oh well.
Click to expand...

Indeed. They have had a 9 month headstart with the 900 series after all.

If the all new die shrink and Pascal does come out Q1 2016 then the 980TI/Fury series could have a very short shelf life.
 
Nvidia are just waiting for the tech to be more mature before releasing their hardware. You do have to wonder though that NVidia can match a fury with outdated memory tech.

what can they do with the same forefront memory tech.....

Something to ponder but honestly as said before.

I'll get a fury X if I can justify the switch from a gsync monitor.
 
Quixote said:
Looks like all performance was defined in relation to the 290x, so I guess what we have is this :

- Fury X = 1.5x 290x performance - $649 - up to 275w power consumption - very good AIO cooling making it quiet and cool.

- Fury = ?x 290x performance - $549 - up to ?w power consumption - triple fan air cooling.

- Fury Nano = maybe 110% 290x performance? - ?$ - up to 145w power consumption - presumably pretty quiet even with it's single fan.

So where does all this leave us ?
- How does 1.5 X 290x performance compare to 980Ti & Titan ?
- How fast will the normal Fury be ?
- How much will the Nano cost ?
- What will be the problem (if any) with 4GB HBM ?

My feeling is the above puts AMD back in the game, rather being a killer blow to NVidia's line-up.
To me the Nano looks like the most impressive thing, priced right it will fly off the shelves & OEMs are going to love it.
Pretty impressed overall.
Click to expand...

This

Impressive will be popular but won't do anything to nvidia interms of market share. Certainly doubt nvidia will lose much sleep if any.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom