• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really? Well, his are running on stock coolers and nothing fancy like water or an after market cooler and he is happy with them, so good on him I say.

?? You didn't notice the smily face? I asked why is results are showing 1.2ghz that's why they are much higher then my stock 7950 results when he said my results are low.

So Crossfire 7950 at 1.2ghz still don't beat stock 290s at 977/1250 I say that is a very good upgrade.

7950s at 1.3ghz maybe?
 
True dat and I don't. My geeky mate loves his 7950s and I spared a moment for him :D

Bring on the beasts and the wars shall resume :D

Lol, yeah we need to move on from 28nm now. The 980 is great n all, but it's been way to long on the same node. hopefully AMD's cards come sooner rather than later, and hopefully not on 28nm :p
 
Kitguru.net reporting on these benchy's now, these guys are getting slow, I beat them all :p

Advanced Micro Devices’ next-generation graphics processing unit is still several months away, but it looks like it is worth waiting. According to unofficial information from SiSoft Sandra benchmark’s database, the forthcoming GPU features unprecedented compute horsepower as well as uses multi-layer high-bandwidth memory with extreme bandwidth.

With 4096 stream processors and amount of bandwidth never before seen on a single-chip graphics cards, the Radeon R9 390X will be the fastest graphics adapter on the market. In fact, with such extreme amount of stream processors, it will clearly leave behind any graphics solution based on Nvidia Corp.’s GM200 graphics processing unit.

http://www.kitguru.net/components/g...ay-feature-4096-sps-extreme-memory-bandwidth/
 
Nice try but that's not how you work out difference in games...

Look at game benchmarks it's around 20fps difference not 49....

You really will try anything to win a debate and you end up looking silly.

Many stupid clams on this forum.

ive seen people say that 3930k @4.5GHZ is the same as a 5960x at 4.5GHz when it comes to pushing 4 cards. Ive also seen people say 8350s dont bottleneck 2-4 high end cards.
 
Somehow I don't think nVidia are that worried ;)

One (conspiracy) theory I have heard is that NV knew all about Pirate Islands and priced the 9x0s aggressively to grub as much market share as they could while they could, as they knew they would be in trouble later.

Of course like I said above it's probably all BS.
 
One (conspiracy) theory I have heard is that NV knew all about Pirate Islands and priced the 9x0s aggressively to grub as much market share as they could while they could, as they knew they would be in trouble later.

Of course like I said above it's probably all BS.

No I don't think this. More likely Nvidia saw an opportunity to release another tier knowing AMD are months away from launching anything. They were already ahead with the 780 Ti and Titan's. Nvidia's profit margin on 970 / 980 will be large as they are still on 28nm (28nm being very very mature at this point), so they might not be priced as aggressively as they could be ;)

My best guess is that GM200 is lying in wait as a response from new AMD cards or saturation of 970 / 980 sales. Whichever comes first.

Nvidia have things sewn up tight atm. I hope AMD come out fighting with their new cards. HBM + 20nm would give AMD a tangible edge over Nvidia's cards. Especially if Nvidia is still using 28nm at that point.

Looking forward to round 2 of the GPU wars :D Just hope they include a die shrink !!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom