• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
+1 ^^^

It all hinges on HBM performnce and how big these 4K SP GPU's are.

If they are 30% faster than the 290X / 20% faster than the GTX 980 Nvidia could come hack at them with a faster 28nm GTX 980TI.

One would think that AMD are aware of this and are themselves holding their best card back until Nvidia show their hand. 5K SP + HBM
 
Last edited:
Not sure if this is for the 'benchmark' thread, but here goes:

Article

Advanced Micro Devices’ next-generation graphics processing unit is still several months away, but it looks like it is worth waiting. According to unofficial information from SiSoft Sandra benchmark’s database, the forthcoming GPU features unprecedented compute horsepower as well as uses multi-layer high-bandwidth memory with extreme bandwidth.

If the listing in Sandra’s database is correct and really describes a prototype of the Radeon R9 390X “Fiji XT” graphics card, the next-generation offering from AMD will feature 4096 stream processors (SPs) (which, in case of the GCN 1.2 architecture, means 64 compute units and 256 texture units) and 4096-bit memory bus. The memory sub-system will rely on SK Hynix’s stacked high bandwidth memory (HBM) chips with 1024-bit input/output interface (compliant with the Wide IO standard).

1h2cnt.png


The graphics card allegedly sports only 4GB of memory since the first-generation HBM features 2Gb DRAM dies and comes in 1GB memory devices, reports Wccftech. Only the second-generation HBM is expected to use 8Gb dies and therefore support 4GB and 8GB configurations.

If AMD’s Radeon R9 390X actually uses four first-generation HBM DRAM chips with 4096-bit memory bus operating at 1.25GHz, then the actual memory bandwidth the graphics card will sport will be whopping 640GB/s.

With 4096 stream processors and amount of bandwidth never before seen on a single-chip graphics cards, the Radeon R9 390X will be the fastest graphics adapter on the market. In fact, with such extreme amount of stream processors, it will clearly leave behind any graphics solution based on Nvidia Corp.’s GM200 graphics processing unit.

1znycz4.png


While performance-wise the Radeon R9 390X “Fiji XT” seems to be very powerful, it remains to be seen how expensive will it be. New types of memory tend to cost a lot. Moreover, given that memory devices have to be placed on the same piece of substrate with the GPU, the whole graphics card has to be redesigned.
 
+1 ^^^

It all hinges on HBM performnce and how big these 4K SP GPU's are.

If they are 30% faster than the 290X / 20% faster than the GTX 980 Nvidia could come hack at them with a faster 28nm GTX 980TI.

One would think that AMD are aware of this and are themselves holding their best card back until Nvidia show their hand. 5K SP + HBM

Why would Nvidia release or show anything before AMD, nvidia have the upper hand now, it is for AMD to come back at them.
 
let me tell you about these cards :-

too loud..........too hot......too big......too expensive :cool:

any two of these and it'll fail
 
let me tell you about these cards :-

too loud..........too hot......too big......too expensive :cool:

any two of these and it'll fail

EVERY AMD thread you whine on about HOT, NOISY, SIZE for AMD cards.

If you have nogthing intelligent to add please refrain from posting.

This is an enthusiasts forum. We KNOW about AMD cards. Guessing on future cards performance is pointless from your one experience with a poorly cooled 7990 - because you couldn't put into practice the help you were given to get your temps down.

Stick to Nvidia pal.:rolleyes:
 
let me tell you about these cards :-

too loud..........too hot......too big......too expensive :cool:

any two of these and it'll fail

You have no idea what you are talking about, you just regurgitating the same Nvidia fan hyperbole relentlessly, like some Nvidia OCD.

Maxwell is a great card, its fast, its efficient... that does not make AMD cards slow and inefficient.

I run a 290 with a 20% over reference overclock 24/7, the maximum temperature it reaches, ever, is 69c, thats a very healthy temperature by any standard.

As for Maxwell, take nothing away from it, its a fantastic card, but its not the second coming, its still capable of pulling every bit as much power as Kepler, not all the time, but most of that efficiency comes from the card not really being pushed that hard, the clever thing about Maxwell is it knows when it does not need to draw that much power, it adjusts its self accordingly, this current generation of AMD Cards, like Kepler still run at full tilt no matter what, even if they don't need that power draw.

There is a good explanation of how this works here.

If the load is held constant, then the lower power consumption measurements vanish immediately. There’s nothing for GPU Boost to adjust, since the highest possible voltage is needed continuously. Nvidia's stated TDP becomes a distant dream. In fact, if you compare the GeForce GTX 980’s power consumption to an overclocked GeForce GTX Titan Black, there really aren’t any differences between them. This is further evidence supporting our assertion that the new graphics card’s increased efficiency is largely attributable to better load adjustment and matching.
So it pretty much depends on what the card is doing, and there are reviews out there which show the efficiency in not quite so good a light.





Respect to Nvidia, great cards, no question.

Its ok to to be a fan of Green, or Red, or Blue, at the end of the day we are all hardware enfusiasts, this anti one or the other is getting rather pathetic really, lets all just grow up and respect each brand for what they are
 
Last edited:
Why do you guys even bother responding to this Mal X kid? He probably never had an AMD card... (inb4: "i did but i had driver issues, bsod, overheating ://")
 
Every thread doesn't need to turn into a VS argument, AMD and Nvidia both make great cards. Nvidia are ahead now, since the 780 Ti and cemented with 970 / 980 but this will cause AMD to comeback strong. Competition is good.

I'll grab whatever is best, if AMD launch 20nm + HBM straight back to the red team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom