Froggeh said:Have 2 pioneer CDJ-800s and a pioneer DJM-300 here. Play mostly a mixture of electro and progressive house with some breaks thrown in every so often.
I'd like a few more features on the mixer so will probably upgrade soon (its a bit basic) looking into getting a second hand A&H off the 'bay. Saving the pennies!
Will post pics up soon
Smiley Man said:oooh CDJ800s - what do you think of them? im saving up for a pair need to get as much advice etc as i can![]()
Clarkey said:Im looking into picking up a Behringer VMX200, looks decent for a beginner, what do you guys think?
[Sniper][Wolf] said:No No NO NO NO!!
they are cheap rip off's of the Pioneer DJM range and are all crap. Seriosly buy cheap buy twice.
[Sniper][Wolf] said:No No NO NO NO!!
they are cheap rip off's of the Pioneer DJM range and are all crap. Seriosly buy cheap buy twice.
Smiley Man said:the DJX700 is a rip off of the DJM600 but when one costs £600 and the other £135 you cant expect the behringer to be the same quality wise as the pioneer
i've had a play on both and yes the DJM600 is much, much better, but if you're on a tight budget behringer arent that bad really![]()
[Sniper][Wolf] said:I wouldnt touch Behringer with a 10ft bargepole..
There are tons and tons of better budget mixers out there for around the same price..
-=BAF=-AXE said:It depends what you want from a mixer.
No other will have built in FX etc or beat and sync counters,
but you will soon out grow this and want a seperate FX unit etc
Andy
Smiley Man said:if you're just mixing one tune into another and listen mostly to trance/techno etc you dont need to use the crossfader, just use the individual channel volume faders
sounds daft but it really does work![]()
Smiley Man said:trust meif all your're doing is mixing one tune into another you dont need to use the crossfader
unless you're scratching etc theres no real need for it, imo of course