Post your hard drive benchmarks!

Mine for you, Raptor 150GB 10,000RPM.

hdtunehu9.jpg
 
Thought I'd add mine.

ST380815AS - C.png


Maxtor 6V320F0 - D.png


Maxtor 6V320F0 - E.png


USB Flash DISK - F.png


1st: 80GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA2 3.0gb/s 8MB Cache 7200RPM
2nd: 320GB Maxtor Diamondmax 10 SATA2 3.0gb/s 16MB Cache 7200 RPM
3rd: 320GB Maxtor Diamondmax 10 SATA2 3.0gb/s 16MB Cache 7200 RPM
4th: Ol' flashy!

2nd + 3rd are identical drives, used to use for raid but found the JMicron raid ports on the 965P-S3 to be too flakey to use properly, so use them as storage (not raided, don't see the point other than Raid1 which is tempting). The seagate is my new drive which I bought purely for a system drive. The last one is my 512mb usb flash drive on "extended loan" from my old job ;) (forgot to give it back, honest)
 
I decided to compare how fast my dynamic raid setup is compared to a single drive.
The test was the time taken to decompress the bioshock demo zip which is 2gb big with no apparent compression

6hi7w4w.jpg

Thats extracting from raid to the single samsung 160gb ide, total time was 2:30

6288voi.jpg


Extracting from the Single drive to itself, total time was 2:20


A third test with no screenshot was extracting from the raid to itself, total time was 2:32.


I rebooted between each test so caching wasnt allowed to factor in too much.
Average filesize is 19.4meg but the zip largely consists of one 1.8gig file with 94 much smaller files. Its disappointing the raid was 9% slower then a plain old drive.
Raid consists of 3x40gb IDE drives all on seperate channels, basically a software raid or winxp dynamic drive overlay.


I'll be turning this into a RAID 10 soon as its not much use presently :/


edit:
One final test I almost forgot is extracting the zip from the single drive to the raid. Because it has such a large file in there, it halved the time taken! Something definetly worth having, I thought the extracting from the raid to itself might show this effect but apparently not, its all about one way traffic I guess.
Total time 1:11, almost a 100% improvement over a single drive. I need to compare two single drives for a proper test though.

660ds3b.jpg



Just adding this as a final shot,
4m2cdhw.jpg


Unzipping from one samsung drive to another gave a total time of 1:14. So the 3 drive software raid0 gives only 4% advantage in comparison to two single drives


Apologies for the spam but Im having problem finding any reliable tests for a dynamic drive setup so Im trying to find a reasonable everyday practical test.
 
Last edited:
Just had to arrange a RMA with my Raptor as I have found out its got loads of bad sectors on it :mad:

I knew something was up with it though and its been doing my head in trying work out what the problem was over the last few days. When I was in Vista my Raptor would all of a sudden just disconnect itself, like it could not access properly. The access light on my case would stay on constant and the only way of clearing it would be to turn the pc off completely to let the hd spin up again.

Hopefully the RMA service with WD is good, I have a feeling it is (fingers crossed). I chose the 'Advance Replacement' option with them.

I will have to bench the new Raptor when it comes, would funny if it was faster than my old one!
 
Mine:
[Primary]
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB ST3320620AS SATA-II 16MB Cache

sgkd7.png


[Others]
Samsung SpinPoint P SP2504C 250GB SATA-II 8MB Cache

sszw4.png


Western Digital Caviar SE16 500GB 5000AAKS SATA-II 16MB Cache

wdgh5.png
 
First up one very old and battered Seagate Barracuda 200gb 7200.7 (st3200822as). which actually did better than i thought it would.. i mean it really has taken some abuse and is very old lol

Benchmark%20Seagate.jpg


Secondly Maxtor DiamondMax 9 120gb drive (6y120m0). done as poorly as i was expecting :) similarly battered drive. (excuse erratic results carried on using windows as normal while it ran :p )

Benchmark%20Maxtor.jpg



gonna upgrade and get a AAKS 500gb drive, probably carry on using 120gb drive for windows, but then use 200gb drive for backups. maybe stick it in NAS or something.. not sure yet. depends on cash flow :cool:
 
Very nice, I may well do the same, any tips for setting up?

Would any 80GB drive be as good or is there something particular about the Hitachi?

HEADRAT
Hitachi's are one of, if not the fastest 7200rpm 80gb hdd out there, speed is very good over the whole drive space. Add to the fact i got them for £15-25, they were a steal too.

64-128k for intel
32-64k for nvidia/amd(ati)

will work a treat. :D
 
HDD's in RAID 0 are fast mmmmk? :D

Holy **** ***** ****** ***** what the **** **** $£%^£

Obviously scsi - guessing 15k (SAS maybe) and what? About 50 of them in a raid 0?

Give it up - how many of what, running what raid/stripe/setup on what controller?

(Is someone playing with work's equipment again? ;) )
 
Last edited:
Will be having a pair of 150GB Raptors in Raid 0 very soon. Will be posting results tomorrow hopefully using the onboard raid function (ICH9R)

Is there anything I should know about setting up Raid 0, as I have never tried raid before. I know people keep going on about stripe size, is this something that you set up when you load the drivers, then format the drive (using a stripe size im guessing). I will be using Vista64 Ult.

:)
 
Holy **** ***** ****** ***** what the **** **** $£%^£

Obviously scsi - guessing 15k (SAS maybe) and what? About 50 of them in a raid 0?

Give it up - how many of what, running what raid/stripe/setup on what controller?

(Is someone playing with work's equipment again? ;) )
12x 15k sas drives in raid 0 :D

Not works, they have no use for stuff like this :D
 
Back
Top Bottom