Associate
4x Western Digital WD2500KS Sata II 16Mb cache, RAID 0, Intel i975X onboard sata raid controller:
Mr Footlong said:4x Western Digital WD2500KS Sata II 16Mb cache, RAID 0, Intel i975X onboard sata raid controller:
That's kinda slow for a 2 disk array - the peak speed is 80% of the way along the array whereas it should be fastest at 0%, like your single disk.RJC said:My RAID 0 array (2 x Samsung spinpoints)
Rob
rpstewart said:That's kinda slow for a 2 disk array - the peak speed is 80% of the way along the array whereas it should be fastest at 0%, like your single disk.
Can you post some more details of the setup and we'll see if we can't get a bit more speed out of them for you.
How are the SATA ports configured in the BIOS? Looking at the manual I reckon they should be:RJC said:If you need any more info let us know.
Rob
rpstewart said:How are the SATA ports configured in the BIOS? Looking at the manual I reckon they should be:
SATA Mode: RAID
On Chip Serial ATA: Auto
SATA Port Speed Settings: Force Gen 2
The other things to check are:
Are the HDDs running in SATA2 mode if they're capable of doing so - check for a jumper on the drive itself.
Is NCQ turned off in the Matrix RAID config?
Scoobie Dave said:150GB Raptor, faster than my old 74GB (8mb cache!)
There's something not right with that trace, that drive cannot transfer data at that rate. Try the long benchmark and see what that gives you, I think the short bench has been fooled by some caching somewhere.sr4470 said:Seagate 320GB 7200.10 SATA2 16 MB cache, NForce 410 onboard SATA2 controller.
Is that the fastest single drive in this thread?