Don't know why Russia didn't just sink it since it's not like we have many ships to spare.
The destroyer was probably already prepared and ready to sink the two russian ships if any of the fired shots looked like they were going to hit.
Don't know why Russia didn't just sink it since it's not like we have many ships to spare.
The destroyer was probably already prepared and ready to sink the two russian ships if any of the fired shots looked like they were going to hit.
Don't know why Russia didn't just sink it since it's not like we have many ships to spare.
Russia always have shops in our waters
Small issue of being an act of war, perhaps?
So you think they'll just let themselve by fired upon with no retaliation? Either way, they'd lose, so might as well go down fighting.
Don't know why Russia didn't just sink it since it's not like we have many ships to spare.
Russia's ships are unreliable rust buckets. They arent up to a naval battle.
Would the UK really want to go to war over one ship?
Would just be doing them a favour by decommisioning their ships for them and justifying Putin's rhetoric.
Yes of course because otherwise where does it stop if you let people take liberties!
Yes of course because otherwise where does it stop if you let people take liberties!
A bit late, they poisoned UK citizens on British soil.
Additional import/export taxes on Vodka?Maybe we've retaliated in other covert ways that the public don't know about.
Maybe we've retaliated in other covert ways that the public don't know about.
I noticed that too. Very interesting.More interesting the article mentions joint ship and navel base building between UK and Ukraine.
Did we go to war when they literally used chemical weapons on us?