Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,009
- Location
- Surrey
That Liverpool kit is hideous, looks like pyjamas.
throwback to the 88 lit if I'm not mistaken. Last time they won the league.That Liverpool kit is hideous, looks like pyjamas.
It's a tactical decision to wear grey shirts. Everybody knows Utd players can't see players in grey.throwback to the 88 lit if I'm not mistaken. Last time they won the league.
Its only a friendly, save the ridiculousness for competitive games. Baily clearly barged him in the back.Diving **** Mane
Diving **** Mane
well he would do on LFCTVCommentator thought he was pushed xD
When you're running and get pushed in the back, you're going to fall over. It was a clear foul to anybody with fully functioning eyesight.He got a push in the back but he then did a ridiculously over elaborate dive.
When you're running and get pushed in the back, you're going to fall over. It was a clear foul to anybody with fully functioning eyesight.
You're saying he wasn't fouled? My stance on diving is consistent, unlike your own.Your defense of your own team diving is amazing Baz![]()
Played reasonably well but there's too much of a pre-season attitude to our game. We should be 2 or 3 ahead but we're lacking an edge in attack, constantly overplaying or taking things too easy.
When you're running and get pushed in the back, you're going to fall over. It was a clear foul to anybody with fully functioning eyesight.
So he was fouled. As I'm sure you've seen, as I've been consistent with this for years and years, even defending Utd players, I've always said that if a player is fouled they have every single right to go to ground because they won't be given the foul if they stay on their feet. And specifically on this instance, if you're running and get pushed in the back, you're going to end up on your arse. You on the other hand, scream and shout when you believe an opposition player has dived and call for them to be retrospectively banned but go MIA when a Utd player divesNo of course, he just 'fell over'
Scoring a goal because you were offside doesn't really count for a great deal. Had Mata not been offside he wouldn't have had the chance. Liverpool have been comfortably the better side but just been almost complacent in the final third. You don't half get touchy during Liverpool - Utd games LokiMata unfortunate with 2 goals ruled offside. No I don't buy it you should be 2 or 3 ahead. More play in final 3rd I grant you bit 2 3 goals better, wind it in
You on the other hand, scream and shout when you believe an opposition player has dived and call for them to be retrospectively banned but go MIA when a Utd player dives
mmmkayScoring a goal because you were offside doesn't really count for a great deal. Had Mata not been offside he wouldn't have had the chance. Liverpool have been comfortably the better side but just been almost complacent in the final third. You don't have get touchy during Liverpool - Utd games Loki![]()