Soldato
Looks like we're after Amorim, all the others touted as front runners have all said they're not interested.
So basically he’s all that’s leftLooks like we're after Amorim, all the others touted as front runners have all said they're not interested.
Carlo was crazy and left as soon as he could, maybe he was bored and wanted a challenge. Spurs have consistently been in the upper reaches of the PL and reached the latter stages of multiple tournaments. Comparing Villa to that is silly.Prem stadiums' 'capacity filled' table shows Arsenal are miles above Tottenham
A PREMIER LEAGUE stadium capacity table shows Leicester have the most filled top-flight arena. But it’s bad news for Tottenham, who are SECOND-LAST and miles behind north London rivals Arsenal. Lei…www.thesun.co.uk
Just look at the stadiums. Villa have a loyal fan base. Three decades ago is no different to 5 years ago. History is history. Form is in the present and not the past. There is no reason why Aston Villa cannot be higher than Spurs in 5 years time.
I wasn't comparing Villa to City and Newcastle in financial might. I was merely pointing out how quickly the tables can turn in football. Then again Villa are no paupers either and could quite easily get back up there with the right manager and focus in place. Also Conte took the Spurs job and they have only won 1 trophy in 20 years. The same with Carlo at Everton.
Carlo was crazy and left as soon as he could, maybe he was bored and wanted a challenge. Spurs have consistently been in the upper reaches of the PL and reached the latter stages of multiple tournaments. Comparing Villa to that is silly.
You say tables can turn quickly but then your example are two clubs that are owned by countries. Sure if a country buys Villa then maybe they will attract a huge name (and even then both your examples had to settle for smaller names for some time)
Villa's owners are the 6th richest in the league.
Irrelevant. It's how much you invest and your ambitions that matter, now how much money they have. Newcastle and City will spend infinite money to get where they want to be because that is why they were bought. Villa owners clearly don't have the same level of ambition.
Adam you calling anyone naive is rich
No, of course not. He will have his pick of clubs that are much bigger than Villa. Plenty of top managers take breaks until another big opportunity comes. Going from Spurs > PSG > Aston Villa is just a disaster, he's not doing that.
Pochettino is favourite to take over but I just don't see it. We'll end up with Dyche or someone equally as pants.
Mourinho has gone to smaller clubs as his ability has decreased, it's not like he went Madrid > Villa > United is it? Ancelotti as already explained was a big surprised, a huge exception and one that he clearly rushed to get out of.Both Mourinho and Ancelotti have both done it though.
**** me people couldn't stop going on about how we were spending too much money and blowing our wage structure out the water for Gerrard and now we don't spend enough.Irrelevant. It's how much you invest and your ambitions that matter, now how much money they have. Newcastle and City will spend infinite money to get where they want to be because that is why they were bought. Villa owners clearly don't have the same level of ambition.
**** me people couldn't stop going on about how we were spending too much money and blowing our wage structure out the water for Gerrard and now we don't spend enough.
Football fans are ******* clueless
Their investment so far suggests yes.Do you think your club is ambitious as City/Newcastle and do you think your owners will invest the same amount?
Ok well we'll see but I'd be shocked if they do. You spent almost nothing in the summer, that doesn't seem that ambitious to me.Their investment so far suggests yes.
We've spent the best part of £80m this year on top of offering wages in excess of double what most players were on under Smith. As I said, clueless.Ok well we'll see but I'd be shocked if they do. You spent almost nothing in the summer, that doesn't seem that ambitious to me.
And how does that compare to what Newcastle have spent? Your net spend over the last few years is almost nothing, that doesn't seem to be in the same realms of ambition or investing.We've spent the best part of £80m this year on top of offering wages in excess of double what most players were on under Smith. As I said, clueless.