Seeing as I like graphs and data I thought I'd show how Panyan's reacted to PWM duty cycle through it's range with a load of 0.35A.
This is EXACTLY what i was going to do in the first few days of testing and report back to you
A nice smooth transition down from slightly below top speed, down to slow speeds. Speed is consistent too. Only varies by an RPM or two once it's set.
the Medium setting seems more versatile for everyday use as there is a nice variation
On high setting it's quite different as high is engineered to cope with a fan or two extra.
I Imagine i'd only enable the High setting if i were to have an evening of benching or something
The converter has been running now for about an hour up and down and it's warm but not too bad. Ideally the heatsink would be exposed to air but it's using the heatshrink to dissipate it's heat instead.
excellent, so it doesnt get hot enough to be a concern
As I remove the PWM connection the fans instantly speed up to maximum as designed.
a fantastic fail-safe!
I'm pretty happy with that.
Onto the LED strip dimmer. This works quite well but does go pretty dim at sub 30% duty cycle. It's hard to say how this will be with single colour LED strip though.
(why is that? )
It could do with a bit of a boost at the lower end. Not quite sure how to do that at the moment but will look into it. Maybe some sort of voltage divider coming in with the PWM signal to boost it from 1v average at 20% to 2v or something.
Panyan said:(why is that? )
It appears the rpm is lower at same voltage on medium setting graph vs high setting.
It's not a perfect world. Maybe I was going up in speed instead of down and didn't wait long enough for things to normalise. The graphs were actually an afterthough after I'd recorded a few values.
very interesting - thanks
Doh it's just the Red LEDs preventing the other LED colours from starting up. Normally a RGB would have a different PWM controller per colour to eliminate the issue.
So I wired up a few purple LEDs to the circuit at ultra low duty cycle and they light up.
So then wired up just the blue parts of my RGB strip to the circuit and it works right down to 20% where the LED basically switch off. Provided you don't go below 30% you'll get good range of light from them. At 30% they are quite dim but will give really subdued case lighting, meanwhile at 100% they are fully bright.
A capacitor might help a little at the bottom range so I will look at adding one just for the low duty cycles, even if it helps a little it'll be a help. Earlier when the red was hooked up it made a big difference low down. More info on that tomorrow. I've got martial arts training tonight so fiddle time is over for now, much to my wife's agreement, as having 6 fans littered around the living room with multimeters and LED strips strewn about isn't making me Mr Popular.
Anyway hooked Residents up and recorded the data from the medium setting.
I'm having a strange issue with the High setting is that despite it supposedly being good for 0.4-0.45A it's not making much difference than the Medium setting and certainly not going near 0.4A. Bit confused by that. Will investigate that but anyway the medium setting which was designed for the 2 SP-120s works a treat.
And to Panyan.
I've added a 10uF cap to the LED dimmer and it helps a bit and lights up right down to 20% now , although it's pretty dim down there, but it's just fine at 30% and has good range through to about 90% where you'd be hard pressed to see the difference to 100%. You may need to increase the capacity of the cap depending on how many LEDs you'll be powering as it'll probably be a lot more than I have here, What I will do is throw in some 22uF, 33uf, 47uF caps in if I suitable ones and you can tailor it to your needs. Bigger caps take longer to fill so throwing a mega 3300uF cap on there wouldn't help at 25kHz.
Another little update for you Resident.
Not quite sure why 400 ohms and 1.1k give a very similar output, when on other circuits using the same components they are markedly different. Maybe there is a gain difference between B772s. I hadn't really considered that there would be that much difference.
Anyway I redid the board (built another but used the same wiring) and put on some fresh resistors using 333 Ohms for High, 1.5k for Medium and 2.5k for Low. I made it 6 holes wide as it just looks better. Will update with pics later.
Again at 0.29A and running off Intel PWM controlled through Speedfan.
This time I've plotted both Medium and High.
http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/Resident-final.jpg[ /IMG]
So I'm happy with that.
.[/QUOTE]
Wow. It's certainly impressive. Can't wait ti get it working in my system.
[quote="panyan, post: 22520026"]lovely, thank you :)
(is it sad that i wait all day for these little updates from Tealc? :p)[/QUOTE]
[quote="doyll, post: 22520085"]LOL. I do and I'm not even waiting for an adapter :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
Hey I check several times a day AND I have subscribed to the thread on the off chance I miss an update LOL
Hey I check several times a day AND I have subscribed to the thread on the off chance I miss an update LOL
Thanks guys. I'm happy you find this so interesting.
I had a partial board built so threw some resistors on in preparation for the control of Leeroy123's Gelid Icy Vision Rev2 .
A little different this one as the fans are stated as 0.5A for the two but I don't believe it will be so high so I created 3 graphs with different loads so one of these should work well for his chosen cooling curve. They were recorded using 0.48A, 0.33A and 0.18A loads on Hi, Med, Lo settings. Resistances were 500 Ohms, 1k Ohms and 2.2k Ohms for the settings. I did originally guess 333 Ohms but it worked out as just a bit top heavy, so a snip later and it was good.
http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/leeroyGPU.jpg[ IMG]
I seem to be starting things but never getting things finished. Sorry about that guys. Saying that though they are all very close to complete, just needing a few blobs of hot glue and some heatshrink and these things can go in the post.
I'm also happy to say that despite messing around with these things and pulling them on an off my PWM header it's still happily working. :) The 1k resistor on PWM input is a safety thing as it prevents too much current being drawn.
All board have now been tested for a good time on my PC, on both Intel and AMD PWM outputs.
And some photos...
First Resident new board
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/P1050213.jpg[/ IMG]
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/P1050215.jpg[ /IMG]
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/P1050216.jpg[ / IMG]
and Leeroy123's
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/P1050219.jpg [/ IMG]
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/P1050220.jpg[/ IMG]
And oops. Hard things and fans don't always mix.
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/P1050212.jpg /IMG][/QUOTE]
Ouch how did you manage that ?
Another update.
Decided to shrink up Resident's circuit today.
http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/P1050222.jpg[ /IMG]
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/P1050224.jpg[ /IMG]
It takes a fair amount of heat to get the thing to go down and the hairdryer I'm using, even though it's 200 watts doesn't do a wonderful job. Anyway it went down eventually.
So that's all ready. :)
So I started another one for Leeroy123, this one will control 2 or 3 Gentle Typhoon AP-15 and thanks to Panyan I know exactly how much they draw.
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/leeroy2.jpg[/ IMG]
As you can see it's not quite finished yet as I've only just started adding the power delivery resistors.
Interestingly I made an error with the Orange wire and wired it up to the gate of the Mosfet rather than the drain and the circuit started working backwards. Increasing duty cycle caused the fans to slow down, reducing duty cycle caused the fans to speed up. I couldn't figure it out for a few minutes but twigged in the end. ;)
In other news I came across this today..
[IMG]http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae72/Tealc_wii/PC%20Stuff/rivalpwmtodc.jpg[/ IMG]
...A similar concept to mine but uses 4 transistors and from the pdf they market it through the potentiometer is used to trim the low end, just like the potentiomter did in my earlier design, before I changed it to the switch to make it simpler for you guys.
I might see if I can't reverse engineer it from that image and see what they've done that needs 4 transistors, although just by looking at it I would guess that the top right 2 are in a darlington configuration to boost current, while the other two might be a NPN and PNP to invert the PWM signal.[/QUOTE]
YAY! Though I got a sneak peak earlier via email :)
As for the rival board. I think your simpler design is better, much less to go wrong. Plus yours draws power from and 'external' source which in my mind is better as it protects the header, stopping the fan drawing too much current. Also the rival board only has only one output.
If what you say is true regarding the extra transistors being using to boost current then wouldn't that indicate that it couldn't power more than one fan ?
As for the rival board. I think your simpler design is better, much less to go wrong. Plus yours draws power from and 'external' source which in my mind is better as it protects the header, stopping the fan drawing too much current. Also the rival board only has only one output.
As for the rival board. I think your simpler design is better, much less to go wrong. Plus yours draws power from and 'external' source which in my mind is better as it protects the header, stopping the fan drawing too much current. Also the rival board only has only one output.
If what you say is true regarding the extra transistors being using to boost current then wouldn't that indicate that it couldn't power more than one fan ?
Also the rival board is a lot more square so heatshrink isnt as neat and harder to tuck away in the case