So as another poster said..."Another one of those idiots that thinks freedom of speech means freedom from consequences." then?
This isn't relevant here. The "consequences" talked about are
societal, not applied to the state. State limits on Freedom of Expression are different.
Freedom of speech literally means you aren't going to be persecuted for your speech by the government. Otherwise what does it mean?
Freedom of Expression, especially in the European conception, has always recognised that there are limits on Freedom of Expression. Yelling "fire" in the theatre is the classic example, but there are many others. As the EHRC
puts it:
Although you have freedom of expression, you also have a duty to behave responsibly and to respect other people’s rights.
Public authorities may restrict this right if they can show that their action is lawful, necessary and proportionate in order to:
- protect national security, territorial integrity (the borders of the state) or public safety
- prevent disorder or crime
- protect health or morals
- protect the rights and reputations of other people
- prevent the disclosure of information received in confidence
- maintain the authority and impartiality of judges
An authority may be allowed to restrict your freedom of expression if, for example, you express views that encourage racial or religious hatred.
However, the relevant public authority must show that the restriction is ‘proportionate’, in other words that it is appropriate and no more than necessary to address the issue concerned.
As I said above, I think mourners at a funeral procession deserve protection from harassment. There have been a number of incidents now, though, and while some seem proportionate, others seem inappropriate and it really does seem the Police have been given a blanket order to stop dissent and protest which is not okay.