Caporegime
- Joined
- 21 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 41,328
- Location
- Cornwall
Huh? I was talking about the buying club not Liverpool and their demands.
If Torres were to leave this summer (which I believe is unlikely regardless of CL football) then it will only be for similar money to what Ronaldo went for, which surely rulse out sensible clubs.
Hang on, if (and it's looking increasingly likely) Liverpool don't make it into the CL this season, won't the owners be up the creek with all the lost revenue? Surely, they'd then be forced to listen to even half decent offers for Torres et al. I really can't see someone spending anywhere near Ronaldo's cost if Liverpool find themselves in financial difficulty.
If Liverpool were in such a bad way that they needed to sell him then i think they'd take 30 mil. A couple of interested parties could well up the price a fair bit though.
Its a funny situation with Torres. On the one hand he is loathe to goto RM for obvious reasons. City still aren't an attraction for the cream of the crop despite their Millions.
Carragher - Woefully off form and making mistakes that he simply wouldn't have made a few years ago. Shouldn't be a first team regular anymore.
.
They could see it as an ideal time to bring in the yes man they've always wanted, someone like KlinsmannI don't see any good in getting rid of rafa, unless they had the money to give to a new manager whats the point.
A squad full of people he has signed.
^^forgive me, but do you actually have an opinion formulated on what you've witnessed or is regurgitating attention-mongering media drivel just that much easier?
Plenty of teams have spent a lot less than Liverpool and currently have a FAR better squad, even if a few players Liverpool have are higher in quality.
Like who? Villa have spent bucket loads, as have Spurs, who has spent less and have a better squad?