And?
You said: Yeah and it performs virtually the same as DDR4 for twice the cost.
The HUB video shows that to be completely untrue. You really should try watching it.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You make very flimsy arguments and ignore the actual content everyone is talking about.Yeah and it performs virtually the same as DDR4 for twice the cost, besides anyone whose built a PC in the last 6 years would likely already have DDR4 so the ram won't cost anything.
Ok it performs the same for +80% the cost.And?
You said: Yeah and it performs virtually the same as DDR4 for twice the cost.
The HUB video shows that to be completely untrue. You really should try watching it.
I guess video playback is broken on your PC, then.Ok it performs the same for +80% the cost.
Even Steve said its twice the cost of basic DDR4 in the video at @27 seconds in so I'm not sure what your all whining about.I guess video playback is broken on your PC, then.
Have you considered upgrading to a new system - with DDR5?
Watch the video again. But this time pay attention. There's a reason he chose the kits he did for comparison. See if you can spot it. Then you can come back to whine at us all.Even Steve said its twice the cost of basic DDR4 in the video at @27 seconds in so I'm not sure what your all whining about.
Maybe if you actually bothered to tell us what your stance is and what you're actually arguing about, others wouldn't be "whining" when they repeatedly prove everything you spout to be incorrect.Even Steve said its twice the cost of basic DDR4 in the video at @27 seconds in so I'm not sure what your all whining about.
If the memory controller runs 1-1 at 6000mhz then dropping the fclk down from 3000 to 2400 for 4800mhz may have a large performance hit but as I said until it's been tested we won't know.I'm expecting DDR5 to work just as well with Zen 4, as Golden Cove. It should actually work better, due to the memory controller working at full speed (upto DDR5 6000 MT/s).
If the memory controller runs 1-1 at 6000mhz then dropping the fclk down from 3000 to 2400 for 4800mhz may have a large performance hit but as I said until it's been tested we won't know.
Straight from the horses mouth, so to speak:..now whether or not this applies to AMD we'll have to wait and see as its not been tested on Zen 4 yet and generally Ryzen has been more sensitive memory speeds.
So it is over double the price if you want the so called sweet spot although personally I'd also want more than just 16gb for a next gen platform else you'll probably end up having to upgrade the memory again.Straight from the horses mouth, so to speak:
AMD announced DDR5-6000 as the "sweetspot" memory overclock for their next Ryzen 7000 "Zen 4" processors in its Discord AMA. In AMD language, a sweet spot frequency is an inflection of performance, stability, cost, and ease. AMD's Robert Hallock, who led the Discord AMA, suggested that FClk be left undisturbed at "Auto" for the best results.
Can see dual stick 16GB kits right now from Kingston for £126. Likely to fall even further going forwards. For Intel and AMD going forwards, DDR5 is a no-brainer now, imho.
Buy DDR4 and you will end up having to buy a motherbpard and new mewmory agaian. Think about dude. Your argument makes no senseSo it is over double the price if you want the so called sweet spot although personally I'd also want more than just 16gb for a next gen platform else you'll probably end up having to upgrade the memory again.
I think what you're forgetting is most people that have bought a PC in the last 7 years would likely already have the DDR4.Buy DDR4 and you will end up having to buy a motherbpard and new mewmory agaian. Think about dude. Your argument makes no sense
Plus you say double the price, put that into perspective, its £55
£55 = half a night out drinking
Your assuming that the PC its in is going to sacrifice it. It's the same argument as upgradable sockets, many people like me, build a whole new rig and the old one gets either sold or off loaded as a whole.I think what you're forgetting is most people that have bought a PC in the last 7 years would likely already have the DDR4.
Well you are making the point yourself for getting DDR5. If you machine is that old then there is no drop in upgrade so time you buy Mobo, CPU and possibly PSU you may as well buy DDR5 too especially if you are only upgrading up to every 7 years heck even 3 years. Worse case scenario you save your pennies for an extra month maybe 2 until you can aford it.I think what you're forgetting is most people that have bought a PC in the last 7 years would likely already have the DDR4.