Yes, honestly I struggle to find reasons to upgrade though, my PC still chugs along with what I like to play...Will be a mighty upgrade then!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yes, honestly I struggle to find reasons to upgrade though, my PC still chugs along with what I like to play...Will be a mighty upgrade then!
My rig is almost 10 years old, a few more months won't hurt.
If you wanted a more modest upgrade I'd get the RX 6700 which can be had for £320 and marginally meets your desire for more vram (+2GB) and should be a substantial uplift at 1440p. Doubled FPS might be pushing it though, but certainly possible in some games.
I wonder if a 7800xt or non xt will be approx £600
If it weren't for VR, I would have probably stuck with my 1080Ti until this year when I got my CHG90.Yes, honestly I struggle to find reasons to upgrade though, my PC still chugs along with what I like to play...
I wonder if a 7800xt or non xt will be approx £600
5nm process is a lot more than 7nmI think it is possible if crypto/the economy doesn't reverse trend.
A downward economy is an immovable object (relative to the size of AMD and Nvidia). So something else will have to give. If that means AMD and Nvidia have to eat into their margins then so be it5nm process is a lot more than 7nm
A downward economy is an immovable object (relative to the size of AMD and Nvidia). So something else will have to give. If that means AMD and Nvidia have to eat into their margins then so be it
That only works when the end user has money to buy your products. There is no point trying to maintain margins at the expense of sales and having your stock left to rot on shelves. When the other option is you take a hit on margins but you're shifting volumes and are still making some semblance of a profit.Trickle down economics is a falsehood, any baseline cost is always passed along in the system to the end user. Back in 2020 the reported xost per wafer of 5nm was $17000, an increase of $8000 over 7nm
The last time there was a serious wafer shortage, AMD did what they were contracted (that is produce lots of console chips with ~10% margins), then allocated most of the rest to CPUs which have far greater margins than GPUs. If Sony or Microsoft want a 5nm refresh, I hope AMD told them they are at the back of the queue this time.
Navi 31 is rumoured to be 330mm² (https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/amd-navi-31.g998), and I'd presume that the defect rate is now pretty good for 5nm. However, unless we know the price per wafer we can't really estimate the cost.
Still, Navi 21 was 520mm² while Navi 22 was 335mm². So we can take the Navi 21 figures; a wafer should yield about 120 fully good Navi 31 dies. At $10k that's about $84, at $15k it would be around $126.
Other costs? Hard to guess. Fancy packaging will add to the cost but Navi 31 could be cheaper than Navi 21.
Welcome to capitalism, warehouses will be full rather than sell at a loss.That only works when the end user has money to buy your products. There is no point trying to maintain margins at the expense of sales and having your stock left to rot on shelves. When the other option is you take a hit on margins but you're shifting volumes and are still making some semblance of a profit.
My point is that when your customers have less money to spend due to a weak economy, you're going to need to compromise to get them to part with their dwindling supply of cash.
At a loss is understandable, however certainly AMD these past few years have been known to spend a huge amount of money on designing, tapeout, etc. and then setting a price which barely sells much. Now while they have other higher margins products which they can use scares wafers for that makes sense. However, the fixed costs of design, masks etc. aren't getting any less so how ever much the stock market may not like it once a product has been designed, it needs volume even at lower margins.Welcome to capitalism, warehouses will be full rather than sell at a loss.
Ah, well that would make Navi31 more like $170 per die. Plus an IO die, packaging, VRAM etc. Not that optimistic on prices.Rumours are wafers at at least $20,000 now. TSMC cashing in.
AMD`s margins are the lowest of the big 3 - 1/3rd of Nvidia.At a loss is understandable, however certainly AMD these past few years have been known to spend a huge amount of money on designing, tapeout, etc. and then setting a price which barely sells much. Now while they have other higher margins products which they can use scares wafers for that makes sense. However, the fixed costs of design, masks etc. aren't getting any less so how ever much the stock market may not like it once a product has been designed, it needs volume even at lower margins.
AMD`s margins are the lowest of the big 3 - 1/3rd of Nvidia.
Rumours are wafers at at least $20,000 now. TSMC cashing in.