• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

really getting fed up with the posts stating RTX/DLSS does not work this gen

AthlonXP1800 said:
I played Control last night and played it for hours, ray tracing graphics is amazing and I am very surprised it ran very smooth at 70 fps at 1080p with all graphics option maxed out in 1st play. Turned on DLSS and I am very impressed with image quality, it ran at 150 fps at 1080p then moved on to 1440p get 45 fps and turned on DLSS boosted fps to 70 fps, but at 4K it was unplayable at 20 fps and turned on DLSS 1440p scaling get 40 fps and DLSS 1080p scaling get 60 fps. Impressive.

I loved played Quantum Break many times and Control blew me away with all ray tracing effects enabled, that with ray tracing lightings, reflections, shadows and it added new ray tracing effect called debris which is first time it use in Control.

I really think Control is the ray tracing killer game that has best showcase of ray tracing. Thank you Remedy and Nvidia.

I am tired of all negative posts. Ray Tracing and DLSS is WORKED this gen!
Click to expand...

What gpu are you using

Glad you enjoyed it
 
I agree, control is the absolute best rt I've seen so far, I run it at 2k and everything on full and get 60fps + even dlss looks good on this but I can't bring myself to it even if it gets me 30 more fps. The 60 feels smooth and perfect as it is.
 
Control is the first RTX game to have compelling ray tracing. I'm still not convinced about DLSS though. I'd like to see some comparison shots of Control using regular resolution scaling with the new Sharpen filter vs DLSS.
 
haszek said:
Here are some comparisons native res vs DLSS

https://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/control_rtx_raytracing_pc_analysis/1
Click to expand...

its 100% the best DLSS we've seen

in control DLSS beats normal upscaling by a big margin - so 1440p DLSS on 4k display looks much better than 1440p resolution on 4k display.
and even comparing native 4k vs 1440p dlss, native doesn't look that much better - it makes 1440p DLSS extremely compelling.

The first game I will have absolutely zero issues with running DLSS
 
Grim5 said:
its 100% the best DLSS we've seen

in control DLSS beats normal upscaling by a big margin - so 1440p DLSS on 4k display looks much better than 1440p resolution on 4k display.
and even comparing native 4k vs 1440p dlss, native doesn't look that much better - it makes 1440p DLSS extremely compelling.

The first game I will have absolutely zero issues with running DLSS
Click to expand...
Hmmm then I will give it a try, I have a 2k monitor but I always try and play at 4k supersampled
 
IT Troll said:
2080Ti 1% Min
Native 4K High Preset (No RT) = 31 fps
Upscaled 4K (DLSS 1440p) RT High = 31.4 fps

RTX On or Off, this games needs a 3080Ti.
Click to expand...

That's not the problem

Oddly weak 1% lows is usually the CPU's fault.

Except that, this game engine doesn't scale well - you get basically the same performance on 4 cores as you do on 12.
That's probably why the 1% lows are bad, the game doesn't really scale beyond a 4 core 3770k
 
Grim5 said:
That's not the problem

Oddly weak 1% lows is usually the CPU's fault.

Except that, this game engine doesn't scale well - you get basically the same performance on 4 cores as you do on 12.
That's probably why the 1% lows are bad, the game doesn't really scale beyond a 4 core 3770k
Click to expand...
I get 27fps all on, rtx full, 4k native. Considering some modern games struggle with 60fps 4k on a ti with no rays, that's pretty good going
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom