I'm sure they would have taken a lot less criticism if the the game was released without all the problems people were having just getting it to run
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Red Dead Redemption 2, GPU Benchmark, What You'll Need To Play!
- Thread starter doody
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,675
- Location
- The KOP
I'm sure they would have taken a lot less criticism if the the game was released without all the problems people were having just getting it to run
Agreed am not saying its been perfect, I myself have had some crashing two so far but didn't have an issue with starting the game.
What I saying here is aimed at the poor port crowd or poor optimisation crowd.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
I'd rather them take this approach than be lazy, just like GTA5 it's gonna push current hardware to its limits
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2008
- Posts
- 6,035
No RTX, no buy. What is this, 2017? Money for old rope this game isNot played it yet, does it look as good as RTX games like Metro which people say looks awesome? Surely not right, it has no RT...
.Graphics are graphics and from what I can see Red Dead Redemption 2 look MUCH better to me than any RTX title.
Crisis was not exactly a small game and rather open and look what that did?
No RTX, no buy. What is this, 2017? Money for old rope this game is
+1?
I does go to show there is yet a lot more that can be done without RT for better graphics and unless the RT hardware keeps growing exponentially to let RT to shine, we will not be seeing anything special for a while. Sure I am glad the hardware is out for devs to plays with, but it really is **** and no better than a demo. But that is not how Jensen sold it on launch. That sly leather wearing marketing genius snake. Lol.
I had another play last night, I thought, am I kidding myself I should be running native 4k, but the image quality difference is absolutely no different between native 4k and 0.75 scaling, so I choose to run 0.75, I tried to turn water physics down from 3 quarters to half or nill and to be fair, it does effect the water, improved fps by like 5 and the horse didn't interact with the water, can't be having that.
Thought I'd go for an explore and check out some non snowy bit early on in the game, my horse dropped dead then me lol.
Thought I'd go for an explore and check out some non snowy bit early on in the game, my horse dropped dead then me lol.
Have you not seen the images from the pc gaming thread? They look much better in my opinion. Maybe if I get the time I can gather some shots of each to show you.
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2008
- Posts
- 6,035
Must admit when I saw the preview and also saw the game marketing image when installing the latest driver I assumed RDR2 had RT implemented.+1?
I does go to show there is yet a lot more that can be done without RT for better graphics and unless the RT hardware keeps growing exponentially to let RT to shine, we will not be seeing anything special for a while. Sure I am glad the hardware is out for devs to plays with, but it really is **** and no better than a demo. But that is not how Jensen sold it on launch. That sly leather wearing marketing genius snake. Lol.
While a lot more can no doubt be done by faking it, using non-RT techniques it'll probably(uneducated view
) be easier with RT. Take Quake 2 with RT for example. You can change the lighting source and observe the end result, so once it's setup it simulates much closely to real life. Not sure if this can be easily done with the faking it method.You're right, RT will really shine in the future. Adoption is key to that too. When most have an RT capable GPU, the developers will solely focus on that rather than trying to fake it too (catering for non-RTX GPU's) and by that time the hardware side of things will be much more advanced.
I'm still impressed with RT, what's been achieved so far. I think next gen will give us an indication on how quickly it might advance moving forward.
I like open world games so may pick this up later
Last edited:
Agreed. Just not impressed with what I have seen just yet, but I am hoping 2020 will change thatWhile a lot more can no doubt be done by faking it, using non-RT techniques it'll probably(uneducated view
You're right, RT will really shine in the future. Adoption is key to that too. When most have an RT capable GPU, the developers will solely focus on that rather than trying to fake it too (catering for non-RTX GPU's) and by that time the hardware side of things will be much more advanced.
I'm still impressed with RT, what's been achieved so far. I think next gen will give us an indication on how quickly it might advance moving forward.
I like open world games so may pick this up later
Yep, if not better, from the images I have seen.
Apparently not.
Yeah it does to be fair, but even so, still much better than anything else I have seen with RT.