Red Sea / Houthi rebels situation


It was USAF Central Command that launched the attacks, not the Carrier Strike group in the area. F-22s would be the logical choice for this type of mission, and it was USAF that conducted the attacks who operate them.

Did you even read that?

"and maritime strike and support assets from across the region, including U.S. Naval Forces Central Command aircraft" that sounds a hell of a lot like a carrier based wing to me
 
Marching for peace != peaceful marching.

Have you actually witnessed a protest in person, or is that just what you've read online?

Israel is allowed to murder children but you're upset about a small minority protesting a bit too passionately.

Another person for the ignore list. No idea why you lot continue to engage with people like this and Roar.
 
Did you even read that?

"and maritime strike and support assets from across the region, including U.S. Naval Forces Central Command aircraft" that sounds a hell of a lot like a carrier based wing to me

Tomahawks from submarines. They already had F-22s in the Middle East since the Summer, they're obviously just very secretive about where they're based and wouldn't confirm using them. I think likely they would've escorted the Typhoons without external weapons and fuel tanks.
 
If you’re American and you want to bomb something, you send a bomber. Preferably one that can’t be picked up on radar.

You don’t send a fighter (the F in F-22) with a very limited air-to-ground capability.

B-2 Spirit FTW.
 
Last edited:
It was F/A-18s from the Eisenhower and TLAM from USS Florida. No F-22's for miles and it would have been an utter waste of time to use them, they barely have AD or an airforce.
 

It was USAF Central Command that launched the attacks, not the Carrier Strike group in the area. F-22s would be the logical choice for this type of mission, and it was USAF that conducted the attacks who operate them.
The F22 is an air dominance/superiority fighter and would never be used for a bombing mission. Once again showing that you know next to **** all
 
Last edited:
If you’re American and you want to bomb something, you send a bomber. Preferably one that can’t be picked up on radar.

You don’t send a fighter (the F in F-22) with a very limited air-to-ground capability.

B-2 Spirit FTW.
Nope. You launch tomahawks from a submarine up to 1500 miles away, using space based surveilance and guidance systems.
 
Tomahawks from submarines. They already had F-22s in the Middle East since the Summer, they're obviously just very secretive about where they're based and wouldn't confirm using them. I think likely they would've escorted the Typhoons without external weapons and fuel tanks.

Christ I even trimmed off the mention of the missiles to avoid that confusion

These strikes were comprised of coalition air and maritime strike and support assets from across the region, including U.S. Naval Forces Central Command aircraft and Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles launched from surface and sub-surface platforms.
 
It was F/A-18s from the Eisenhower and TLAM from USS Florida. No F-22's for miles and it would have been an utter waste of time to use them, they barely have AD or an airforce.

That's what the videos would suggest says, CENTCOM released videos of them launching F-18's from from a carrier
 
Back
Top Bottom