Road Cycling

lordrobs in "I got another bike light and I'm disappointed with it" shocker :rolleyes:

Lezyne Micro Drive rear. 4 hours on steady 30 Lumen mode so they say. My one was on amber (<50%) after 40 minutes... This combined with the fact that it doesn't actually have a last setting memory (only the front has this it would seem) makes it a bit useless for me really :( Front is ok. Tried it on 300 lumens and I'd be able to get home slowly I imagine that on 400 it would be OK but going on the performance of the rear light it would only last about 20 minutes :rolleyes:
 
lordrobs in "I got another bike light and I'm disappointed with it" shocker :rolleyes:

Lezyne Micro Drive rear. 4 hours on steady 30 Lumen mode so they say. My one was on amber (<50%) after 40 minutes... This combined with the fact that it doesn't actually have a last setting memory (only the front has this it would seem) makes it a bit useless for me really :( Front is ok. Tried it on 300 lumens and I'd be able to get home slowly I imagine that on 400 it would be OK but going on the performance of the rear light it would only last about 20 minutes :rolleyes:

Have ridden on my 400XL & Strip for 4 hours + on the brightest & quickest setting. Not much left in them after that though I think.
 
Have ridden on my 400XL & Strip for 4 hours + on the brightest & quickest setting. Not much left in them after that though I think.

I think its borked. Checked the manual and it should remember the last used setting, my one definitely doesn't. Also clicked the power button and it is showing green again.
 
So I'm going to ask santa for the moon nebula rear light and lezyne front light. What backup/blinkers to look out for as well? Anything cheap and easy I can find I guess?
 
Curious HRM readings ive had since a week ago when i got my Garmin HRM. Watch type so ive been wearing it 24/7.

Previously id only ever monitored my HR off phone apps - just here and there to make sure i wasnt going to accidentally cash in the life insurance. I appear to have a resting heart rate of around 50 bpm, thetefore i conclude that i may be turning into a tortoise. Also my 2 minute recovery heart rate seems pretty good.

Shame that i dont have the quads or basically any sort of respectable endurance to back up the nice HR stats :p :(
 
Curious HRM readings ive had since a week ago when i got my Garmin HRM. Watch type so ive been wearing it 24/7.

Previously id only ever monitored my HR off phone apps - just here and there to make sure i wasnt going to accidentally cash in the life insurance. I appear to have a resting heart rate of around 50 bpm, thetefore i conclude that i may be turning into a tortoise. Also my 2 minute recovery heart rate seems pretty good.

Shame that i dont have the quads or basically any sort of respectable endurance to back up the nice HR stats :p :(

That is just Garmin resting heart rates for you. When DC Rainmaker did a review he couldn't work out where the figure was coming from and neither can I as a slightly overweight guy with a resting heart rate of 49 :p

Talking of Garmin I hope they extend their "TrueUp" data correlation thingy to Edge units. Would be nice not to have to wear my fenix while riding without losing a chunk of my daily activity monitoring.
 
50BPM isn't low and if taken from the wrist I would take that resting HR with a pinch of salt.

This Fitbit thing I have tends to be out about 3/4BPM at times during rest and when up around threshold 184BPM the Fitbit can be as much as 10BPM lower.
This is compared with my Garmin chest strap at both resting and threshold. But at resting I can also compare with counting pulse for 30 seconds and doubling. The Garmin chest strap is insanely accurate, but measured at the wrist is always a bit out which coincides with what I have read due to the way in which they measure and almost all variants share this same technology.

Resting HR is best used in line with your maximal which is easy to obtain. Beyond that, your threshold HR and then better still is enough data gathered to identify your zones. A resting HR of 50 if your maximal is 150 versus a resting HR of 50 with a maximal of 200 would indicate very different things in a human if the only single bit of info you had on them was HR values, purely for example.
 
Last edited:
Had a good 2+ hours on the turbo sunday morning, as planned (was going to ride with Ross but he'd already quit by then!). Spent the first 45 holding power levels, sprinting around and then had my first ride up the pretzel. Brutal, long yet awesome climb! Really enjoyed the lower and middle parts so put some efforts in (was mostly stood), along with a strong top section but was empty for the final bit after powering to the false 'finish' to drop a guy. Ooops! :D

Still, 5th on the OcUK club board for it (ok, I know there's only 7 on there but still!) :p:cool:

Did my last hour just easy spinning while watching TV. Felt quite good after the earlier efforts but over the 2 hour mark things were getting quite tender... Can't imagine what multiple hours (or even 12) feel like! ;)
Agreed, but I quite like the arm names, but wonder how many they actually got on there.
Would be interesting to see, although the arms are cool they don't offset the tacky cub-scout rear... :rolleyes:
I passed 5000km this morning.<snip>
Legs are a bit tight this morning and my ass is delicate.
5000km what's that in real money? 500 miles? ;)

Hardly surprising the legs are tight! Supreme effort regardless mate, huge kudos! Your charity page shows an incredible amount raised for just someone sat in their garage! ;)

I've not donated yet, got a paypay account (or justgiving page) so I can send you some? I try to avoid using my card for sites I'm probably never going to use again. :)
 
That is just Garmin resting heart rates for you. When DC Rainmaker did a review he couldn't work out where the figure was coming from and neither can I as a slightly overweight guy with a resting heart rate of 49 :p

Sat here at my desk this morning I took my pulse from my wrist (manually) and I got 56 bpm, at the exact same time the Garmin showed 57 bpm average.
 
Hmm you are the third person I've heard from whose eyes started to revert back from the surgery.

That does put me off slightly, considering the expense.
The short sightedness creeping back in is just natural - when you consider the operation burns away part of the lense of your eye, it's only natural it'll eventually repair itself! :cool:

Mine cost me £2500 back in 2003. My boss at the time said he'd 'pay for one eye' and my parents paid for the other as a birthday present. I'd never have afforded it myself at the time. My glasses alone were £400-450 every 3-4 years...

When I consider having it again it now, I'm very tempted. Knowing I'll get approx '10 years' out of them (which would then put me at 46) along with the current cost of the operation (£700/800, last time I looked - not very recently) it's a bit of a no brainer. I'd be the best part of 50 and probably need glasses shortly afterwards.

The only current thing holding me back is I went through a year of before care as my perscription wasn't as settled as they wanted, this involved a trip to Birmingham/Cardiff every 3-4 months. When things settled they operated and I had to return for checkups 3-4 times over the next 2 weeks. The after care then involved tests/checks every 3 months afterwards (for 12 months). As I had a 'floater' in part of my eye afterwards (bit of scar tissue which floats within the eye) they continued the after care for another 2 checks (6 months) to confirm/reassure things were all ok. I felt very well looked after and really had incredible service which is what all the cost was for. I'm not convinced I could easily take the same time off work these days for all of the checks & appointments.

The operation itself took 10-15 seconds each eye. I distinctly remember staring at the red light, crackle/snapping of the laser and then seeing the 'surgeon' clear as day when he leaned over me. It shocked/stunned me as I'd not seen that clearly before my whole life, even with glasses (which I'd worn since the age of 6/7). The operation itself doesn't hurt, there was just a burning hair kinda smell, which is slightly disconcerting as you realise that's your eye! :D:eek:
Once you get used to putting them in, it's easy. You literally just place them on your eye. I don't understand how people lose them around the side. It's very hard for them to go there.
I tried contacts once, it wasn't the putting in that I struggled with... It was the removal! :eek:
Apparently I will never be able to get laser eye surgery either?

I just ride around half blind with no glasses/contacts. Not died yet. That's what Sean Kelly or Boonen would do. They wouldn't rely on Specsavers.
Long sighted? The way I understand things, most short sightedness is the lens of the eye being too thick (which they can laser away), whereas most long sightedness is caused by lens shape and much harder to correct (they can't just laser it away).
Unless conditions are great, I'd much prefer being able to see properly over being macho.:p

Even on a clear sunny day, going through a shady, wooded area without my prescription inserts can make spotting potholes and road debris trickier.
I always ride with eye protection anyway, just not perscription ones. I don't feel my eyesight is 'bad' enough to need them when riding. When driving it's another story, I can generally drive in the mornings and wearing glasses makes little difference. Later in the day when my eyes are tired (or lower light conditions) I need them, no question! Although the only real times I cycle at night now are commuting, I can see enough to spot all cars and don't need to worry about pot holes as I know the roads (so don't wear my specs)! :o:cool:
 
Sat here at my desk this morning I took my pulse from my wrist (manually) and I got 56 bpm, at the exact same time the Garmin showed 57 bpm average.

I'm not disputing their general accuracy but their resting figures seem to be based on the lowest recorded reading that day.

Maybe my resting HR is inconsistent (44 on Sunday, 61 today for example) because I don't wear it overnight.

I can't take Zwift segments with anything other than a huge pinch of salt as there are so many variables. In fact I wish I could just automatically log the workouts to Strava without having the stupid made up map and "LOL, nailed it (with resistance set to minimum)" segments.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom