I need people's opinions. I've pretty much decided that I really want a Bianchi in my life, but I also want Ultegra Di2. How insane would I be to buy an Oltre XR1 that comes with Potenza and then buy a full Di2 groupset to fit on it just so that I can have the bike in Celeste? Am I being ridiculous?
I've just sold mine and used the funds to buy a groupset. In a few months I'll buy a frame to put it on, maybe even some wheels...I must remember to NEVER get a power meter.
Cycling shouldn't be complicated
You mean you want Record EPS, surely...I need people's opinions. I've pretty much decided that I really want a Bianchi in my life, but I also want Ultegra Di2. How insane would I be to buy an Oltre XR1 that comes with Potenza and then buy a full Di2 groupset to fit on it just so that I can have the bike in Celeste? Am I being ridiculous?
I did until I looked at the prices! Even Chorus EPS is insane compared to Ultegra Di2You mean you want Record EPS, surely...
Another point I would like to raise : The method of calculating a 1 hour FTP result = 95% of Critical Power (CP) 20 minute FTP is flawed. Unless you are a pro or serious rider most average riders doing an CP20 test are at 80-90% of their 1 hour power. Some riders who can complete a CP20 test probably couldn't even finish an hour FTP test
Tenuous link, but still kinda linked. We'd discussed it before where I think touch/xdcx said about a time to fatigue test being a better measure of things. It's certainly more applicable to racing but part of the 'appeal' of FTP is the easy measurement of it, along with a single number which is easily used to judge efforts in training against (especially intervals). It's used everywhere when it comes to software/turbo trainers (probably too much so) which has lead to people comparing their FTP's against each other (totally wrong application for it!). One thing I've noticed more recently is many of the races on Zwift being measured by w/kg, which I think is a much better measurement for 'comparisons' between riders (I'm not saying it's the best!). A huge part of that I think is the 'American' influence of lots of bigger guys riding with big FTP numbers, yet with rubbish 'endurance'. W/kg 'balances' them against the more traditional light weight cycling physique better.I guess it being unrelated makes sense, though still a little odd given the flow of conversation
A power meter is exactly the opposite, you immediately have the answer to those questions, the 'did I go hard enough there' and 'am I pushing hard enough now' are immediately answered.I must remember to NEVER get a power meter.
Cycling shouldn't be complicated
Campy all the way!Shimano is for mountain bikes and SRAM is for weirdos.
WKO4 and Golden Cheetah can model your data and give you a proper calculation that will be a hell of a more accurate then 10 seconds on a calculator. It boggles me the people that avoid using such software as they are terrified of data, yet they bought a power meter for hundreds of pounds which is literally a training tool to be used to train to precise data
Shimano gets around, I'll admit.Exactly, that's why everyone rides Japanese frames with their Shimano groupsets.
In an ideal world, yes, but it doesnt work for everyone. If you can't use power on every ride then a lot of the data is meaningless.
With a powertap, I cant use it on my mtb/cross rides in the winter and I use my race wheels for racing so it misses out a large chunk of my riding. That puts the TSS and freshness graphs out, particularly if you race a lot and most of the summer is spent in a race/recover cycle. It's also going to miss some of the max power, ftp, etc stuff as well.
I'm sure you'd still get some useful data from it but there's also a lot of guesswork involved to fill in the gaps too.