Road Cycling

Genuinely angry and disappointed that I can be that much slower :(
Same days it just works out like that, can feel super strong & fast but the results say otherwise! There's so many factors which can all contribute to how you 'feel' on the bike, as well as how quick you actually are. Don't get stressed or angry, if anything channel it into your riding. One of the hardest things when riding regularly is being consistent, if you're riding multiple days fatigue can have a huge impact too - you may feel ok, but you're riding with a 10% (or more) reduction in power for the same 'feel' as the other days.

Same principle but the other way of doing it. Means you don't get colossal problems finding wheels, you get the finding cranks instead
Agreed, although they don't really state what the difference is - if they're increasing/decreasing crank spindle length I'd imagine there's going to be lots of problems with frames & clearances!?

The marketing BS machine continues
Haha, I thought the same! Disappointed Campagnolo succumb to the usual sales & marketing BS, but they are Italian :rolleyes:

Threw some Fulcrum Racing 5's on my Defy 1 tonight - feels a bit more spritely from a quick 1 mile test ride, further testing on track Thursday (subject of course the sodding the weather).

Not a bad upgrade for £190, probably 200g saving, hopefully won't need truing every 2 minutes like the OE wheels.
Good choice, you'll notice them more on longer rides with some gradients. When I changed the Giant P-R2's on my Defy 1 to cheapy (£120) Campagnolo Khamsin the difference was noticeable, even with only a minor weight difference (I did it as a 'cost saving' exercise after breaking a spoke on the Giant wheels and needing them truing 3 times in 2 months). When I switched again to Shimano RS81's (£350) the difference was HUGE! :cool:

Interesting about the UT crank. I'd assumed it would be the same as the potenza crank with the self extracting powertorque. Bizarre that it isn't if I'm honest, but that's campag for you.

On the basis I'd almost say potenza has no point, centaur or chorus are the choices.
Have to agree about potenza, but from reading the article they almost hint that it will be changed so they're all ultratorque? Maybe they'll add more features or drop the price point or something similar when they do.

Just bought marathon plus tyres.
decided to go for some puncture resistant tyres.
Fitted them (25's) on my other halfs commuter soon after she got it, has done around 2000 miles (around 10 months?) with only 1 puncture. Mostly inner city commuting, but all weathers & through the winter. They're wearing fine but are quite heavy. Although I recall the wire bead on them being utterly brutal and incredibly tight to get onto her Giant wheels! Think I wrecked the last of my non-Park tool levers getting them on. LBS by her work only charges £5 for a puncture repair so I've tried to encourage her to go there! ;) :D

Well 1st Training Bunch ride last night and man, that was a whole other level!!
Brutal one, supreme effort! Kudos! :D

Sounds like my attempt at the chaingang - riding threshold until you blow, then you're just hanging on until you finish/quit! It's a sure fire way to get quicker if done regularly enough. I was in bits for days and it really ruined the rest of my week so I've been slack about going again. My attempt at the 'easier' thursday social ride wasn't much better! ;)

Did 1 rep of the golf course climb last night, I was intending on doing it twice but it took a little longer than I expected. Also rode too soon after food so spent the first 20 minutes 're-eating' my dinner on a few occasions lol :o
 
If potenza goes to ultratorque then there will be basically nothing to choose between centaur and potenza apart from tiny bits of weight difference here and there and maybe the quality of the parts. If that happens, then I agree with Saytan that your choice is basically centaur or chorus.
 
Agreed, although they don't really state what the difference is - if they're increasing/decreasing crank spindle length I'd imagine there's going to be lots of problems with frames & clearances!?


SCS attempted to solve the problem by making the hub effectively narrower, having the cassette in the 130mm position on a 135mm hub

I'd guess this crank makes the axle longer. This makes the chainline wider, but with the cassette in the 135mm position, it also makes the chainline straighter in the smaller sprockets
 
Nice work booyaka. 104% intensity, you need up update your zones ;)

Went KOM hunting for a TT segment last night (on my roadie :D) I made about 18 months back. Knocked 2m44s off, was hard work though! Interesting what pacing and another 25w does.

That feel when legs so dead that the final climb on the 28 just felt weightless :p
 
Nice work booyaka. 104% intensity, you need up update your zones ;)

Went KOM hunting for a TT segment last night (on my roadie :D) I made about 18 months back. Knocked 2m44s off, was hard work though! Interesting what pacing and another 25w does.

That feel when legs so dead that the final climb on the 28 just felt weightless :p
That's one long 'sprint' :p
 
SCS attempted to solve the problem by making the hub effectively narrower, having the cassette in the 130mm position on a 135mm hub

I'd guess this crank makes the axle longer. This makes the chainline wider, but with the cassette in the 135mm position, it also makes the chainline straighter in the smaller sprockets
Makes more sense than the SCS solution, I reckon. I'd rather be limited by chainsets than wheelsets.
 
I thought the same about this new version of centaur. It's hard to know why you'd go for potenza except to save a few grams, unless there's some major difference in the quality of the parts or their durability. I also have to agree that it doesn't look great - these 4 arm chain sets are just dire, but apparently they're better so I guess we're stuck with them. The new centaur actually has ultratorque rather than powertorque, so that would definitely push me away from potenza to centaur as powertorque just looks like a nightmare.

I want to try campag on the next bike I build, which will be a carbon affair, so I will be looking for something decent that will last, but I also don't want to spend a fortune if I don't get on with it. It looks like I'll go for centaur at this rate. That'll at least give me a chance to see what I make of it. I'll then have a bike with each of campag, sram and shimano so I'll have a good idea of what I like best, which will dictate what goes on the custom steel bike I intend to get myself for my 40th. The funny thing is with the differing prices on groupsets I could look at chorus, force or ultegra di2 so that's quite a range of things to look at. Mind you, road.cc had some leaked shots of the new ultegra groupset and it's hideous, so that idea might get shelved right away.

Don't some Campaq parts need their own tools?

As for the next Ultegra, now than Shimano offer the control/battery/firmware upgrade for 6870 Di2 (see here), I'd buy 6870 when it gets reduced to make way for the new one.
 
Can you explain that a bit more for me please? I know my peak heart rate is normally around 170 so what do I need to do to update my zones.

Your strava link shows 96% for me? Don't think you need update them.
Intensity based on your power data which Strava derives from your FTP (1 hour thresold power). So for a 1hr 16min ride @ 96% intensity you averaged under your perceived FTP.
Massively generalising and it is Strava data so would not worry too much or over-think it.
 
Don't some Campaq parts need their own tools?

As for the next Ultegra, now than Shimano offer the control/battery/firmware upgrade for 6870 Di2 (see here), I'd buy 6870 when it gets reduced to make way for the new one.

Probably missed the boat a little, prices were dirt cheap at the back end of last year (I got it individual for my TT bike and grabbed front and rear mechs for £109 each and junction boxes for less than £20)
 
Your strava link shows 96% for me? Don't think you need update them.
Intensity based on your power data which Strava derives from your FTP (1 hour thresold power). So for a 1hr 16min ride @ 96% intensity you averaged under your perceived FTP.
Massively generalising and it is Strava data so would not worry too much or over-think it.

cheers - I noticed my FTP on strava was set at 230W - I'm more like 255W so I've updated and you might have seen the "updated" version, which @BennyC probably saw the 230W (104%) version.
 
Cassette tool is slightly different
I have a tool set for doing bearings on UT cranks, but most folks would probably just pay a shop for the infrequently that it needs doing.

That's about it really.
I have a campag cassette tool as my old single speed bike had a Miche bottom bracket that needed a campag cassette tool.

You can get a UT bearing remover/installer kit for £30 from superstar which is not nearly as ludicrous as I'd expected.
 
rubbing the actual caliper? that's impressively tight.

Pretty sure yeah. 25mm tyre and there's about 2mm above the tyre and a few mm either side.

I had to stop on a climb before because a leave got stuck to the tyre and was making a noise every rotation between tyre and caliper.

c1de5a25-9697-4f52-adc8-b82d33823847
c1de5a25-9697-4f52-adc8-b82d33823847
fwmXxYy.png
 
Pretty sure yeah. 25mm tyre and there's about 2mm above the tyre and a few mm either side.

I had to stop on a climb before because a leave got stuck to the tyre and was making a noise every rotation between tyre and caliper.

c1de5a25-9697-4f52-adc8-b82d33823847
c1de5a25-9697-4f52-adc8-b82d33823847
fwmXxYy.png


my sunny sunday steel bike has the pads at the top of the slots like that. It's pretty tight with 23s, let alone 25s.
 
Back
Top Bottom