• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Rocket lake leaks

Daylight_Invader said:
Not that I am aware. Hey AMD are even looking in the ARM direction.

Lots going on at the moment affecting all the key providers out there. It's an exciting time, and I am glad we are finally getting some good development and competition as the last few years has been pretty awful on the hardware side.
Click to expand...

I think AMD getting on the ARM bandwagon is a good move, actually i think any semiconductor designer of this sort of size who isn't looking at their own ARM designs is an idiot.

They are already working with Samsung putting AMD Graphics IP in their ARM designs and AMD did look seriously at ARM a few years back, its time.
 
4K8KW10 said:
Intel's BIG.little is still x86-64, nothing to do with ARM. It is only a hybrid between new-gen Atom and new-gen Core cores.
Click to expand...

I think we all understand that. The idea however is still the same. Requisite processes are still routed to the most appropriate core to execute.

Both Intel and AMD are signed up as ARM licensees. Let's also not forget RISC-V and how that might change the entire market, but I think that discussion is best saved for another thread. :)
 
humbug said:
Didn't AMD say they looked at it and they ain't going to bother? i think the words they used are something along the lines of "we don't feel the need to get our core count up on paper"
Click to expand...

I suppose technically there can be some benefit if AMD did use 8 big core CCX and 8 little core CCX, they'd probably to do some other architecture changes but that's the concept. The benefits I speak of would be laptop battery life, this does nothing for desktop. However AMD has absolutely no issues getting best in class by a mile battery performance with its low TDP 16 thread Ryzen processors at this time (I remember there are some 90wH laptop models one with 4800HS and one with i9 10 series where the 4800HS has like 50 to 60% more battery life, it's embarrassing)
 
Lol Intel has to artificially segment its CPUs

the 11900k isn't able to stand in its own vs the 11700k so Intel nerfed the IMC on it to make sure it won't be able to run memory at the same 1:1 speed as the 11900k
 
Grim5 said:
Lol Intel has to artificially segment its CPUs

the 11900k isn't able to stand in its own vs the 11700k so Intel nerfed the IMC on it to make sure it won't be able to run memory at the same 1:1 speed as the 11900k
Click to expand...

Maybe this is what the Magic BIOS(tm) does for the 11700K. Maybe it sets the default back to Gear 1 so that the benchmarks on the ones that were sold look worse than the review samples.
 
https://videocardz.com/newz/another...7-11700k-rocket-lake-s-posted-ahead-of-launch

Much better scores here.

Though news that Intel has seeming artificially gimped the i7, lowering it's cache frequency and forcing IMC in 1:2 at DDR3 3200Mhz, which massively increases latency.

I guess Intel wanted clear segmentation between the 8 core i7 and 8 core i9, though achieved it through artificial gimping. Bad news for those wanting to pickup a i7 and clock the nuts of of it, doesn't affect those going after the best gaming CPU, the 11900k.
 
Also for extended periods, those single clock rates are unlikely to hold at the sort of TDP that Intel needs to hold to achieve those bench scores.

Really looking forward to the real next generation Intel chips when hopefully a bit of real competition will come back.
 
I see Ryan got the smack down trying to create another pointless trolling thread. :D

New data firmly cements that RKL should be avoided and if you were thinking of buying a 11700K don't, just get a 10700K or 10850K, it if you want the fastest get the 5800x.

Value still stays with the 10400f until such time it is discontinued, it something better comes along at ~£120
 
Journey said:
I see Ryan got the smack down trying to create another pointless trolling thread. :D
Click to expand...

Honestly he just needs banning at this point. A new thread everytime a benchmark comes out spouting it's "the ultimate gaming CPU" with all evidence pointing to the opposite.

The guy is either being paid for it or just a fruitloop.
 
Dave2150 said:
https://videocardz.com/newz/another...7-11700k-rocket-lake-s-posted-ahead-of-launch

Much better scores here.

Though news that Intel has seeming artificially gimped the i7, lowering it's cache frequency and forcing IMC in 1:2 at DDR3 3200Mhz, which massively increases latency.

I guess Intel wanted clear segmentation between the 8 core i7 and 8 core i9, though achieved it through artificial gimping. Bad news for those wanting to pickup a i7 and clock the nuts of of it, doesn't affect those going after the best gaming CPU, the 11900k.
Click to expand...
You should do stand up. You are a funny guy, persistent too. Whats the 11900K like 50% more expensive then a 5800X and at best getting 1-2FPS more, yeah cracking buy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom