Who would lose more, Utd trying to force Rooney to go abroad or Rooney if he sits on the bench for 18 months? The Glazers would never be able to force a sale to City, it just wont happen (just look at the furore with Tevez and then Utd didnt even really have a choice, and never owned CT to start with - it would be 10 times worse if Rooney was to try it)
A sale to Chelsea or Arsenal for 1/4 of the cash would be far more palatable by everyone concerned.
What would be ten times worse if Rooney tried it? Going to City? You really think he gives a **** how much it would upset the united fans to make the switch to a club that will pay him more and will back up his own ambitions in the transfer market. It's not like he hasn't done it before.
He's already been tapped up.
His agent is a ****. I'm sure something is already in mind and I doubt it's abroad.
A sale for 1/4 of the cash to arsenal more palatable to you but not to the people who pay the wages and the bills. 50 million from city or 12 million from Arsenal. I know exactly where he will be heading because city will give him a signing on bonus as well.