Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 20,701
- Location
- Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
Yeah I heard that nugget, unreal.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
RTX 4070 12GB, is it Worth it?
- Thread starter Author_25
- Start date
- Status
Yeah I heard that nugget, unreal.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2011
- Posts
- 8,582
So much cope.
We didn't need Intel to do that to know there was not a huge gap in memory prices, especially in this market where memory prices have come down.
It was always obvious Nvidia did it. Product segmentation and maxising profits.
You should know that very well. You keep buying Jensen's top SKU on release
Only the best for me
Funny that because some seem to think it's down to NV's "agressive pricing"...
Nvidia's soon to be launched $599 8GB GPU is going to be super aggressive alright, aggressively destroyed in reviews that is
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2011
- Posts
- 8,582
6700xt takes care of 1440p and down for midrange builds.
7900xt replaces the whole nvidia series for 4k and lower only exception is 4090 but you know pay double for it also.
So the pricing is official now, good stuff:
videocardz.com
Not so good for MLID though.
TGP of 200w.
Looks like the rumoured shader count was wrong, as the diagram indicates more shaders than the RTX 3070.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 specs and $599 pricing confirmed, 186W average gaming power - VideoCardz.com
NVIDIA claims GeForce RTX 4070 consumes 186W on average in gaming A few days ago, we revealed the final retail price of the GeForce RTX 4070 GPU, the fourth Ada Lovelace desktop graphics card. Today we have ‘official’ confirmation. In case there was any doubt on what GPU might RTX 4070 use...
videocardz.com
Not so good for MLID though.
TGP of 200w.
Looks like the rumoured shader count was wrong, as the diagram indicates more shaders than the RTX 3070.
Last edited:
So the pricing is official now, good stuff:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 specs and $599 pricing confirmed, 186W average gaming power - VideoCardz.com
NVIDIA claims GeForce RTX 4070 consumes 186W on average in gaming A few days ago, we revealed the final retail price of the GeForce RTX 4070 GPU, the fourth Ada Lovelace desktop graphics card. Today we have ‘official’ confirmation. In case there was any doubt on what GPU might RTX 4070 use...
Not so good for MLID though.
TGP of 200w.
Looks like the rumoured shader count was wrong, as the diagram indicates more shaders than the RTX 3070.
There is nothing in the graphic that shows core counts, probably because they are the same or lower than last Gen. Nvidia trolling again
What does 29 shader even refer to?! The 4070Ti for example has 60 SM equating to 7680 CUDA cores (or 128 CUDA per SM). If we assume 5888 is correct this would mean 46 SM for the 4070 which is the only number being touted at the moment.
Oh hang on, are they referring to the Tflop performance in Mas FP32 when they mean "Shader"?! That makes even less sense as the other numbers quoted are the qty of units of each RT/Tensor/OFA and not their throughout..
Obscuring the details is pretty much bang on the money tbf.
Oh hang on, are they referring to the Tflop performance in Mas FP32 when they mean "Shader"?! That makes even less sense as the other numbers quoted are the qty of units of each RT/Tensor/OFA and not their throughout..
Obscuring the details is pretty much bang on the money tbf.
Random numbers..... IMO its fake.
Good spot, I didn't even notice that as I was too focused on where the **** 29 had come from as a unit number.
It's not fake. It's just mixing Gflops and TOPs and stuff like that.
It won't be giving counts.
OFA will be that optical flow thing.
edit:
www.engadget.com
RTX 3070 has 20.3 shader TFlops, 39.7 RT Tflops. Whilst not in the above link gonna guess 163 Tensor TOPs.
It won't be giving counts.
OFA will be that optical flow thing.
edit:
NVIDIA RTX 3070 review: A hot rod GPU for the practical gamer
NVIDIA's RTX 3070 is a phenomenal deal for $499. It's basically just as fast as the $999 RTX 2080 Ti.
www.engadget.com
RTX 3070 has 20.3 shader TFlops, 39.7 RT Tflops. Whilst not in the above link gonna guess 163 Tensor TOPs.
Last edited:
Then i look forward to a 400 tensor core 4070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 FE: Specifications & Features
www.overclockersclub.com
It will be 400 INT8 Tensor TOPs. RTX 3070 is 163.
Youre the one who is reading a unitless number as cores.
Last edited:
Don't you think its odd that it has such a round number?
Okay... also, explain 67 RT cores when the 4070Ti has 60 and explain that against 29 Shaders, whatever that is supposed to be, 29 doesn't go in to 67 any which way.
I hadn't spotted that, good point. If that's the case, then the RTX 3070 TI has been rounded up to an FP32 of 22 TFlops.
I don't like how videocardz doesn't give a proper source / link to where they got the info from, the slide looks unfinished...
Also, the image showing the specs is really low resolution, and possibly photoshopped.
But a FP32 of 29/30 TFlops is about where I expect the RTX 4070 to be, especially when comparing it to the RTX 4070 TI, with a FP32 of 40 TFlops.
Last edited:
29 Shader TFlops. 67 RT Tflops.
You just need to check the links I gave. It's easy to work out using the 3070.
We are looking at a slide out of context. The purpose of this slide is clearly to say, their 3rd gen RT cores and 4th gen Tensor cores are way better. They are then providing the compute numbers.
Last edited:
- Status