Or anyone who can’t afford to pay hundreds per hour to a law firm. So 99% of the working population.
Russell Brand.
- Thread starter Von Smallhausen
- Start date
Or anyone who can’t afford to pay hundreds per hour to a law firm. So 99% of the working population.
Soldato
Questioned again about a further 6 allegations.
Russell Brand questioned by Met for second time over six further sex offence allegations
Police question Russell Brand in relation to a further six allegations of historical sex offences.
www.bbc.co.uk
Commissario
It's not censorship, it's just that it becomes really tiresome dealing with GD levels of nonsense.
Except it wasn’t nonsense.
Don
Been getting spammed hit pieces about him again on social media for some reason this past week, but other than that no.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,413
I met Russell just the other day, out with his family and their dog. We chatted for a while, but I decided I had better things to do with my time.
He seemed to be exactly the sort of person I expected him to be, albeit taller... and his dog desperately needs a good brushing!
He seemed to be exactly the sort of person I expected him to be, albeit taller... and his dog desperately needs a good brushing!
Commissario
This thread is for Russell Brand. I thought there was a new thread for Huw in SC but it appears not. If anyone wants to discuss Huw Edwards, please start an appropriate thread there. This thread is not for Huw Edwards.
Why in SC? Whats so special about this particular BBC paedo?
Soldato
Because it stops knuckle draggers from posting vitriol formed from the primitive part of their brain rather than actual discussion points.
You can post in SC if you like or do you not have access?
Caporegime
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,417
Because it stops knuckle draggers from posting vitriol formed from the primitive part of their brain rather than actual discussion points.
You can post in SC if you like or do you not have access?
Lost access to SC in June myself.
One strike because a word I used wasn't caught by the swear filter and then another strike another because someone posted a wall of conspiracy theory nonsense and I implied a toddler would have a better understanding of World events.
Que Sera Sera.
Edit - Not a dig at the mods, just making those posters aware.
Last edited:
Soldato
I always thought there was a rolling 12 month thing with the strikes in there so no one was ever permanently banned, unless they reached 3 strikes which you don't appear to have *shrug*
There is, but when someone gets 3 strikes in a 3 month period...
Soldato
Is there somewhere you can view your own strike level on here? Just curious
This is where I’ve never understood the point of SC, why is such behaviour (though I disagree with how you’ve described it) acceptable in GD or any other part of the forum?
Maybe a question for an actual thread rather than potentially derailing this one.
This behaviour does get moderated though I feel that some poster's will deliberately cause trouble and troll knowing the rules abit more lax and also some use it to shut down debate from other's they have a axe to grind with so it gets moved to SC and then used as some sort of flex against the people who cant access.
Commissario
Ahem.
What do any of the last dozen or so posts have to do with Russell Brand?
What do any of the last dozen or so posts have to do with Russell Brand?
We are trying to understand why Overclockers are censoring any comments about a soon to be convicted peado by insisting any thread is in SC where it will be restricted to those that foolishly defended him last time round?
@Richie you may not think that sicko's like him deserve all the vitriol they get but maybe you should reflect on that..