Russell Brand.

Roar87 said:
I guess the main problem with that article is that the Daily Mail has labelled him anti-Capitalist, where as he's not labelled himself that. He's simply said that we should address inequality and corruption. Also Buckingham Palace isn't something the Queen has gone out and earned, he's actually earned all of his money off his own back and is clearly free to spend it on whatever he wants. He's obviously doing his part for people less fortunate than him.
Click to expand...

Yeah he's earned all of his money off his own back by being disingenuous about his beliefs.

Like any addict...He flips and flies to the next biggest thing.I once was under his spell..Thinking he had points to make.

It was all an act, all propaganda to line his own pockets with pounds.

The guy is an absolute jerk. A clever manipulator.:mad:
 
easyrider said:
Yeah he's earned all of his money off his own back by being disingenuous about his beliefs.

Like any addict...He flips and flies to the next biggest thing.I once was under his spell..Thinking he had points to make.

It was all an act, all propaganda to line his own pockets with pounds.

The guy is an absolute jerk. A clever manipulator.:mad:
Click to expand...

The Socialist equivalent of a Southern Baptist Preacher.

GOD wants me to have a Cadillac for every day of the week!

GOD wants you to pay for it!

Pass round the collection dish!
 
Didn’t see this thread lol anyway his denial would be more credible if he listed the allegations and would also spoil the exclusivity of the programme..
 
n111ck said:
Didn’t see this thread lol anyway his denial would be more credible if he listed the allegations and would also spoil the exclusivity of the programme..
Click to expand...

Deny what.

First someone needs to actually say it out loud not mumble into a private letter to him.

Even if you're guilty as hell you still wait to see what they have before opening your mouth and inserting feet by possibly giving information they didn't have.
 
Last edited:
Hotwired said:
Deny what.

First someone needs to actually say it out loud not mumble into a private letter to him.

Even if you're guilty as hell you still wait to see what they have before opening your mouth and inserting feet by possibly giving information they didn't have.
Click to expand...
The allegations were put to him in a letter and email.

Channel 4 doing a BS hatchet job on him I could imagine but apparently the newspaper is The Sunday Times so there must be some substance to the allegations.
 
His choice of words at times in that video, as well as the many, and sometimes slightly fringe, counter-attacks, make me question his honesty.
 
n111ck said:
Didn’t see this thread lol anyway his denial would be more credible if he listed the allegations and would also spoil the exclusivity of the programme..
Click to expand...

Agreed. Failing to mention the allegations makes him looks worse, and suggests to me that he's guilty of whatever he doesn't want people to know he's done.

maschio said:
Plenty of flak you'll get, when over the target you are
Click to expand...

You'll also get flak if you're found to be a horrible person who does bad things in private while publicly pretending to be the good guy.
 
Last edited:
Russell Gland

I actually watched that, invoking Joe Rogan was the best bit, second to the frequency of the word “consensual”.

So still no idea what this could be about :D
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom